ajani

7 ms·

1.
by ajani 3y ago
Oh wow, this suddenly became so heated! Is the gun made of # or _? Or it has to be both?
2.
by ajani 3y ago
Ok I see your point. Did you look at the output in the challenge? It's very different. I wonder why? Different seeds maybe.
3.
by ajani 3y ago
Ok, but it's still acceptable by any common sense standard. Besides the challenge's output is completely off. Not just that it's using just one of the characters. It spells out something else. Which is not the case here.
4.
by ajani 3y ago
The challenge is flawed. I asked one of the questions from the quiz to chatgpt which the quiz claims GPT can't solve. But it did. Prompt: Write out the word "hello" as an ascii art drawing with # and _ Output: _ _
5.
by ajani 3y ago
Doesn't it flatten all behavior and not just impropriety?
6.
by ajani 3y ago
Yes but resolution and coherence matters. A map that says "here be dragons" is not high resolution. A map that misidentifies or misses parts is incoherent. The brain is not physical (as explained above), and cannot be captured in
7.
by ajani 3y ago
> While there are no specific equations that fully capture the intricacies of the brain's function.. That.
8.
by ajani 3y ago
All climate models are based on mathematical physics models. I don't know the specifics, so I asked chatGPT and here is what it said: ''' Climate modeling is a multifaceted field rooted in physics that relies on a comple
9.
by ajani 3y ago
> It's mostly machine learned from the environment and other humans. We call this child development. Yes, exactly. The software lies in humanity collectively. Not inside us, but in between us. Which is why it cannot lie entirely in
10.
by ajani 3y ago
Tesla to become roadX.
11.
by ajani 3y ago
"The brain" is made up of matter, yes. "The brain" is not physical like columns or iron. Those are simple objects. The kind physics likes to deal with. Things that are easily measured to describe its properties quantitat
12.
by ajani 3y ago
When a vortex forms in a pool of water, it is formed by the complex interplay of water, the pond made up of earth, rock, plants, its undulations perturbing the water, the wind etc. The vortex appears and vanishes as conditions change. But i
13.
by ajani 3y ago
It's not clear what the idea is here. Which is why all the questions. I suspect, as you said, that a much more complex data structure would be required to encode all the various aspects of production into its constituent elements and t
14.
by ajani 3y ago
This is just tedious. The electro-chemical map of the brain that is built and used to study it, is so primitive. Almost certainly, "the brain" tunes itself to its environment and inner states from a preformed inner structure throu
15.
by ajani 3y ago
Surely the dip is temporary.
16.
by ajani 3y ago
Yes exactly. Behavior drives success. Not merit. Behavior is social. No sarcasm here, just acceptance of what is obvious.
17.
by ajani 3y ago
I see. So would the dialogue be part of the textual description? What would be a typical unit? A keyframe? A bucket of frames? Because the elements are temporal and visual, I think some form of “object in time” relation must be encoded in t
18.
by ajani 3y ago
Yes, how we behave usually trumps how true/false our ideas are.
19.
by ajani 3y ago
I see where you're going with this. Elemental (motif-based) editing instead of timeline and frame based editing?
20.
by ajani 3y ago
Have you tried using any LLM for this task? LLMs are text-in text-out systems and excel at transformations of text.
21.
by ajani 3y ago
Which point would be enough by itself for you to discount him totally?
22.
by ajani 3y ago
Thinking itself is a projection of consciousness. Thinking is "learned" behavior.
23.
by ajani 3y ago
> If carcinization happens when languages evolve to be more like Rust, then what do you call it when Rust evolves to be more like Java? Caffeination? Surely oxidation is better than carcinization. And rust evolving to Java would be miner
24.
by ajani 3y ago
Or you could tag it "Fox Terrier" and only you know why you gave your friend Juan that name.
25.
by ajani 3y ago
Companies usually don't have all their parts aligned or even functioning properly. And you cannot change that. Your work isn't just the product, it is navigating an imperfect structure to achieve what you need to, despite the fa
26.
by ajani 3y ago
No. It wouldn’t be vulnerable to that. You would at most be able to deanonymize a certain percentage within the impostor network itself. Kind of pointless. Physical access of devices is the only way to have some chance of deanonymizing some
27.
by ajani 3y ago
You are missing a crucial aspect of this. There is no identifier. Only a connection. An identifier is something that relates to more than one thing. A connection is its two endpoints. It is those ends. Who is at each end is unknown and cann
28.
by ajani 3y ago
Let's say the whole network is just 4 nodes. A, B, C, D. And A and B are connected. And C and D are connected. And I have physical access to all 4 devices. In phone A, you will have B's contact stored locally, let's say as &q
29.
LispKit Lisp(github.com)
3 points by ajani 3y ago|0 comments
30.
by ajani 3y ago
Computing/computers?! Ironic that no mention here. Nor in additional comments.

More ›