airocker

6 ms·

1.
by airocker 11d ago
Wondering if hn ever considered doomscrolling and why they did not do it
2.
by airocker 23d ago
Sub Question : IS there a real successful agent product today that uses a library for harness(like langgraph etc)? Building our own worked for us. Works with our components(postgres, events ...) and scales naturally with our system.
3.
by airocker 28d ago
sorry all OLTP
4.
by airocker 29d ago
Postgres its all you need means to me(IMHO) postgres for all Olap (DB + message) , not all analytical databases.
5.
by airocker 3mo ago
Great article. Few suggestions: - If you are bootstrapped, you can build dual use technology. - All of this is predicated on the idea that building software is hard, you need 8 years to build a product that people like. Maybe this is all go
6.
by airocker 4mo ago
We have been working on https://talentpulsar.ai for exactly this. Hope to find some good collaborations with the hn community with some little self promotion, hope this is okay.
7.
Ask HN: We built a good implementation of dev containers: Seeking GTM partners
2 points by airocker 4mo ago|0 comments
8.
by airocker 7mo ago
If good and bad both get amplified, I hope the equilibrium is maintained.
9.
by airocker 8mo ago
Debezium was built exactly for that to power a queue based on WAL.
10.
by airocker 8mo ago
We had considered Oban when deciding whether to go with Kafka/Debezium or not. We sided with Kafka because it can do high throughput ingestion and it is easier to maintain it with cursor in today's world. Postgres is not meant for
11.
by airocker 9mo ago
Google predicting that hn frontpage will not change at all? lol
12.
by airocker 1y ago
Would this mean cursor and cline don’t have to do context management? Their value is much more just in the ui now?
13.
AI just killed billion dollar palm reading industry(chatgpt.com)
2 points by airocker 1y ago|2 comments
14.
by airocker 1y ago
This is not an easy inference. For this inference to be true , you have to know how much of the expense goes to salaries . Also, you have to give credit to tsmc to be world class which enables them to control prices, it may not translate ac
15.
by airocker 1y ago
Makes sense. Btw, I gave you two likes since you have pretty low karma here on HN :) and I know how that feels.
16.
by airocker 1y ago
Sure, but llm may be more unbiased and give high quality summary. But I won’t do it again, I am sure you have thought about it much more than I have.
17.
by airocker 1y ago
Just so others don’t have to do it. I did not think this post was hn worthy so wanted to save some time for others. Maybe hn needs to do it automatically
18.
by airocker 1y ago
Conclusion The data points cited in the article are mostly accurate, based on available government reports (e.g., USCIS, ICE, NACE). However, the interpretations and causal claims are ideologically framed and often lack nuance: Sound in ide
19.
by airocker 1y ago
[flagged]
20.
by airocker 1y ago
But none of them would end up becoming Coca Cola. At least not just by selling hot dogs.
21.
by airocker 1y ago
Maybe it is not, you need much more context about the OP to declare this as a straw argument. Confidentiality agreements are generally very boilerplate. If someone is thinking that this is preventing them from working at something, they are
22.
by airocker 1y ago
why downvote this? I have gone through this route and can vouch this is for a good cause, this conversation may mislead people into believing stealing is okay.
23.
by airocker 1y ago
I can bet they happened with NDAs. Noncompete is another story, that is not the OPs problem here.
24.
by airocker 1y ago
Brand takes money to build. IF an employee took the secret to their rich uncle when coke was small, we would not be talking about Coke. Whatever small the formula was.
25.
by airocker 1y ago
IF you go to an interview, and nothing was divulged to you, this NDA does not mean anything. But if youwork at a competitor, and you get an interviewer tell you things that the company does not want to divulge, company has some protection.
26.
by airocker 1y ago
if coke did not have deep pockets, it would have gone under without this protection.
27.
by airocker 1y ago
I think if the extremely close replicas ever threatened Coke's existence, they would sue. Especially if a former employee started it. I think trade secret protection is the only thing that enables a company to operate. Especially small
28.
by airocker 1y ago
That’s my whole point. They are not using Coke’s formula
29.
by airocker 1y ago
There is a difference between trade secrets and non compete. If you can compete with the company without using trade secrets, like make a drink that people like without using Coca Cola secret, it is fine.
30.
by airocker 1y ago
So if you are against this, you are okay with Coca Cola’s secret to be divulged by any employee to any competitor? If you cannot let companies maintain trade secrets, you may as well close them down.

More ›