aionwikipedia

5 ms·

1.
by aionwikipedia 1mo ago
the extent to which grokipedia is a disaster is, in a way, kind of fascinating: - system prompts leaked all over the place ("Never speculate or make up information. Do not claim anything that is not verifiably true" etc) as well a
2.
by aionwikipedia 2mo ago
most papers like this are flagged by AI detectors because, by your own admission, AI was used to generate the final output. what exactly did you expect here?
3.
by aionwikipedia 2mo ago
even if your writing is influenced by "the AI style," it would likely only show up in patches, a word or rhetorical flourish maybe, but AI-generated text doesn't "sound like AI" in patches, it does so consistently a
4.
by aionwikipedia 5mo ago
Yeah the "more than a paragraph or two" is key here. Indicators of AI writing work both ways; the more text you write, the more likely you are to "slip" and use some phrasing or syntactical constructions uncommon in LLM
5.
by aionwikipedia 5mo ago
This is a myth. At least one study (Juzek/Ward) has shown that these stylistic patterns do not appear nearly as often either in well-known datasets of English language -- including datasets restricted to specific dialects of English. T
6.
by aionwikipedia 8mo ago
If you know what you're looking for -- and no, that does not mean em-dashes, they're a low-signal indicator and people get precious about them -- your false positive rate can get pretty low. See Russell et al, "People who fre
7.
by aionwikipedia 8mo ago
"Usually revisions are approved manually by real people." almost never the case besides a select few articles that get heavily vandalized and require all edits to be approved. otherwise, anyone can edit Wikipedia at any time, whic