ahsillyme

7 ms·

1.
by ahsillyme 5d ago
Assuming they can achieve funding without IPO probably yes. But if they can't there's always the dilemma that "if [good guys] won't do it then [bad guys] will". I'd like to think that the leadership at anthropi
2.
by ahsillyme 6d ago
This is weird. I can't think of a better compliment that is simultaneously safer. They'll always trail on data generation then, no? So I can't see the point. Best case for moonshot they get to lie about benchmarks that are ga
3.
by ahsillyme 8d ago
I think the way to understand the objection here is that it's rhetorical flair (grandparent's dictum) that feels like it's intent is to assuage -- because it's a conditional that is implicitly loaded with an assumption a
4.
Escaping the Quicksand: A Call to Arms(arxiv.org)
1 points by ahsillyme 27d ago|0 comments
5.
by ahsillyme 29d ago
I find the language less impervious than has been suggested generally, but that it's reasoning is astonishingly, unbelievably bad. Not sure why the focus has been only on language, am I the only one seeing this?
6.
NASA Lessons Learned System(llis.nasa.gov)
3 points by ahsillyme 2mo ago|1 comments
7.
by ahsillyme 2mo ago
Happened by this wonderful resource by accident.
8.
by ahsillyme 2mo ago
Only way to improve safety of software is the ability to find the flaws of said software. If they did lower safeguards, it's probably positive for software safety standards.
9.
by ahsillyme 2mo ago
Tried it, Opus 5 is just as conceited and incompetent and Opus 4.8 (and always ego-tripping when facing it's contradictions), think I'll stay with Fable who behaves like a professional without a fragile ego. Sonnet 5 is probably s
10.
by ahsillyme 2mo ago
Sonnet 5 is probably better than Opus 4.8 in many cases -- you may want to try it; I now use only Fable and Sonnet unless the task is explicitly one where Opus can't de-scope and be lazy (e.g. replicating exactly a system as a coarse m
11.
by ahsillyme 3mo ago
Since this will not be able to be used for coding or code auditing, what use is it? Not being glib, not a rhetorical question. I'm trying to stretch my creativity, and I can't see what it's for.
12.
Phantom Type(wiki.haskell.org)
2 points by ahsillyme 3mo ago|0 comments
13.
Algorithmic Information Theory Data Compression Challenge(arxiv.org)
1 points by ahsillyme 3mo ago|0 comments
14.
by ahsillyme 4mo ago
I thought that there was a name clash: https://web.archive.org/web/20071010015641/https://martin.an... but I can't actually remember what that that wterm was. Not the same I would imagine. (edit: wh
15.
Step in Tine: Forking Processes in Functional Choreographies(arxiv.org)
1 points by ahsillyme 4mo ago|0 comments
16.
Neuro-Symbolic Ode Discovery with Latent Grammar Flow(arxiv.org)
1 points by ahsillyme 5mo ago|0 comments
17.
by ahsillyme 6mo ago
I read that as implied.
18.
by ahsillyme 6mo ago
I think it betrays cynicism about the tendency for single-objective optimizing market actors to rent-seek and cartelize. I don't think it's a stretch at all. On the surface it would be equally preposterous to suggest that breathin
19.
by ahsillyme 6mo ago
Interesting. It's the only commercial distro I could ever stomach, in fact I really like it but don't use it, (because there's a non-commercial distro that I like much more). (Edit: my point was that it would feel like a real
20.
by ahsillyme 6mo ago
Alright, it was my assumption that we'll be left with a totally dysfunctional economy, and in that sense whatever's in you bank account means very little. If I were an oil exec I wouldn't trade that world from what we had bef
21.
by ahsillyme 6mo ago
I don't think any reasonable person would think this decision works to fill the coffers of anybody. Everyone is getting shafted.
22.
by ahsillyme 7mo ago
What's in the autocorrect dictionary usually has nothing to do with what you typically write. No reason to wonder (i.e. if the insinuation being that that's a word they'd typically use).
23.
by ahsillyme 7mo ago
> "Personal Computing" is going to become a luxury of the past, and we’ll all be terminal-renters in someone else's data center. Yep. My take is that, ironically, it's going to be because of government funding the cir
24.
Optimal Software Pipelining Using an SMT-Solver(arxiv.org)
2 points by ahsillyme 8mo ago|0 comments
25.
by ahsillyme 9mo ago
More or less. Unless it's something to do with the employee's privacy or something to that effect. Doesn't mean the criminals are the good guys here, since they're trying to make bank on it instead of releasing it to the
26.
The quadratic knapsack problem (2025)(sciencedirect.com)
2 points by ahsillyme 10mo ago|0 comments
27.
by ahsillyme 10mo ago
I wouldn't be so sure of that assertion regarding attention span. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluralistic_ignorance granted, it's about opinion rather than capability but the same bias would explain such
28.
Kleene Algebra(arxiv.org)
3 points by ahsillyme 10mo ago|0 comments
29.
Massively Parallel Proof-Number Search for Impartial Games and Beyond(arxiv.org)
1 points by ahsillyme 10mo ago|0 comments
30.
by ahsillyme 10mo ago
I've toyed with the idea that maybe this is intentionally what they're doing. Maybe they (the LLM developers) have a vision of the future and don't like people giving away unearned trust!

More ›