Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ahns
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ahns
2mo ago
Interesting; how do the examples compare to datashader? Edit: for my use cases, I use napari (~1e7-8 points) if I need true interactivity; otherwise, datashader/holoviz, or even just fast-histogram's 2D histograms work. For extrem
2.
▲
by
ahns
6mo ago
Hm, since I can't edit my comment: link to paper [0] [0] https://pub.math.leidenuniv.nl/~smitbde/papers/2003-de_smit-...
3.
▲
by
ahns
6mo ago
One of Dutch artist M.C. Escher's works is a man is admiring a piece of art that itself depicts the building the (very same) man is in [0]. Escher left out the middle bit of the painting, probably since it's fairly complicated, pu
4.
▲
by
ahns
10mo ago
I'll just leave this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_German_National...
5.
▲
by
ahns
1y ago
In my limited experience with static cards you really do just end up learning the "appearance" of a card, which is why I've been more successful with dynamic cards, like say a card showing a concordance randomly selected from
6.
▲
by
ahns
1y ago
Ha, looks like it's finally been flagged.
7.
▲
by
ahns
1y ago
The aforementioned trapezoidal rule (Tai's method): https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/17/2/152/17985/A-M...
8.
▲
by
ahns
1y ago
You may enjoy this, from a top-down experimental perspective ( https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/galleries/small-world-in-mot... ). Only a few entries so far show intracellular dynamics (like this one: https://w
9.
▲
by
ahns
1y ago
I suppose so, but this message from NOAA ( https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/messages/2025/06/MSG_20250625... ) shows a period of five days til shutdown, which seems extremely abrupt.
10.
▲
by
ahns
1y ago
It's honestly impressive how efficiently and smoothly things are regressing.
11.
▲
by
ahns
1y ago
To add to this, non-exhaustively, from various other places including reddit: Krennic's meeting on kalkite: * structured like the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wannsee_Conference * takes place at the https:/
12.
▲
by
ahns
2y ago
Well... there is also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_disease
13.
▲
by
ahns
2y ago
Huh. I wonder what the difference is between this projection and the recentered [Nicolosi projection]( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolosi_globular_projection ), which has been around for way longer.
14.
▲
by
ahns
3y ago
:/ [tell me about it...]( https://paulbourke.net/dataformats/svs/ )
15.
▲
by
ahns
3y ago
As far as I know, not technically (although I haven't kept up in the area), but you can definitely sweep through a volumetric sample; there are microscopes that can for example illuminate a thin z-plane of a transparent sample and coll
16.
▲
by
ahns
3y ago
I work with microscopy data and we have to convert all the proprietary-but-still-readable-by-some-random-package image data generated by microscopy companies to ome-tiff/ome-zarr for it to be in a manageable format. I think it's g
17.
▲
by
ahns
3y ago
Every few months or so I come back to that article always in awe
18.
▲
by
ahns
3y ago
Ha, that reminds me of authorship being determined by a few rounds of SSB: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.6526...
19.
▲
by
ahns
4y ago
For microscopy images, have you tried ashlar? https://github.com/labsyspharm/ashlar It may help to have the microscope stage positions available in the OME metadata.