ahmetson

8 ms·

1.
by ahmetson 23d ago
You can. For example for verifying enough funds the immigration office could ask the bank itself. But it also adds additional problem, such that without users concern they can do anything. Even if it’s solved with papers and users signature
2.
by ahmetson 1mo ago
I think they know it’s not soon as they promise so they lie openly.
3.
by ahmetson 1mo ago
Disagree. I got other opinion. People make some unique things as a team. As co-founders. So chat between them and even if it’s slightly others’ advice helps. Why other advices are not working is that they don’t know nothing not anything.
4.
by ahmetson 1mo ago
It doesn’t work on the mobile phones yet. Could you look at it? I use iPhone 14
5.
by ahmetson 1mo ago
But it’s not working that way, there is a third party like attestation that provides the data to client to generate zk proof
6.
by ahmetson 2mo ago
What if I don't use customizations at all, bare prompt per feature or function only? Do those customizations help?
7.
by ahmetson 2mo ago
When an ecological shoes company pivot to AI, I wonder why StackOverflow executives don't pilot for AI now.
8.
by ahmetson 3mo ago
For false positives, how about generating the test units and run it in isolation? All major languages have the interpreters or embedded languages to execute function only.
9.
by ahmetson 3mo ago
Programming is a craft. People like to write things, so you have plenty of solutions: programming languages, frameworks, game engines and more this kind of tool. It’s not bad that they port redis into code. It’s not good thing neither. I’m
10.
by ahmetson 5mo ago
Is it happening in the popular repos?
11.
Ask HN: Is the idea of CascadeFund clear and interesting? (early landing page)
1 points by ahmetson 10mo ago|0 comments