Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aggronn
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
aggronn
4y ago
Projects can still effectively be denied/delayed from discretionary environmental review. State is working on pre-empting or expediting that as well for these affordable housing projects.
2.
▲
by
aggronn
5y ago
The definition of inflation is nominal changes in prices. This can be caused by supply/demand shocks, which is where the term "transitory" comes from--inflation during a period of economic transition. The alternative to this
3.
▲
by
aggronn
5y ago
Yeah, I am sympathetic to people concerned about inflation right now, but the basic Econ 101 explanation you give is just too compelling to alarm me (and apparently the Fed and others who do this for a living). There is a clear mismatch in
4.
▲
by
aggronn
5y ago
I'd be interested to see the land use code where this 10 duc with one allowable parking spot is going. This must be a HUUUGE townhouse to go there if its only permitted to fit one car. is it 1 car garage or literally, a garage with no
5.
▲
by
aggronn
5y ago
10 units per acre is 1 house per 5k sqft lot--this is plainly single family detached housing. No one in that zoning is having parking issues. When you start talking about 35duc then you start having parking issues--but at 35duc, you're
6.
▲
by
aggronn
5y ago
The solution isn't to build more parking, its to reduce the need for car trips. Improve transit and support commercial development in the neighborhood. The fact is that we're in a housing affordability crisis. We need builders to
7.
▲
by
aggronn
5y ago
I think this makes sense, and I might have agreed before I married someone working in a public sector union and saw how awful working in the public sector is compared to private (for many, but not all, professions). My perspective has been
8.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
I wonder if you (and OP) are conflating "anti-homeownership propaganda" (perhaps some exists) with anti-single family housing zoning "propaganda"? I follow land use topics pretty closely and I'm not sure I've s
9.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
Its not a different issue entirely. Saying that is wrong and its harmful. Our "class system" is defined by the deliberately racist history from which it is derived. Communities of color are not disproportionately poor (and visa ve
10.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
Picking this new world order climate hysterics cabal conspiracy theory malarkey apart a little bit.... > Climate hysterics want to avoid responsibility for the economic damage that their carbon-neutral policies are going to have on socie
11.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
Alternative is to not subsidize inefficient suburban land use. That doesn't mean everyone lives in apartment buildings. It doesn't mean "ban the suburbs". It just means, if you want to live in a subdivision, you'll
12.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
I'm also doing this in chrome. I have about 5 different profiles, aliased to things like `chrome-work`, `chrome-personal`, `chrome-dev', etc. I would love to use FF, but iirc FF doesn't provide something like `firefox --profi
13.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
Yes, there's a lot we need to be doing to put pressure on the CCP that we aren't currently doing, and it also doesn't need to be binary. There's a difference between Apple doing business in China, and a Chinese company d
14.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
The issue isn't whether TikTok is currently doing it or no, its whether this is a national security risk in the future, which is absolutely is. I think he's an idiot and he's using the issue to distract from Russian interfere
15.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
Taking this as true, are you suggesting we should have, instead of our (expanding on what I think you're saying) "non-democratic capitalist ologopoly", have our important companies and institutions be run the by the CCP? Two
16.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
Here's a very short list of pro-democracy or pro-human rights dissidents and what kinds of punishment we know happened to them as a result: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_dissidents Here's some
17.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
I don't think the problem is that if/when it happens, it will be "undetectable". The issue is that if we have a polarized party-over-country political environment (which we do currently have), there is absolutely no guar
18.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
My typical setup is that I have a single desktop for each project I'm working in. Web projects split into 4 panes. Top left, browsers (different chrome profiles running in different i3 tabs), bottom left dev console (same), top right v
19.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
The most common case of "Sharing data with 3rd parties" is when the first party uses their targeting platform (usually DFP/GAM) to serve a campaign to an advertiser looking for a specific audience. For example, NYT might sell
20.
▲
by
aggronn
6y ago
XPS 9560 4k model (2017 15") using Arch Linux. Recently formatted and re-installed arch (i had made a mess of some core linux things over the years and wanted a clean slate), and I don't recall any specific issues that were not us
21.
▲
by
aggronn
7y ago
Who picks what we vote on in this scenario?
22.
▲
by
aggronn
7y ago
When you upload to GEDMatch.com, you are agreeing to make your DNA available to be compared against others for identification or research purposes. That's the entire purpose of the service.
23.
▲
by
aggronn
7y ago
This isn't a unique characteristic of writers, or creatives for that matter. This is a well studied phenomena, especially in Urban Economics, called Agglomeration. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_agglome
24.
▲
by
aggronn
7y ago
Programmatic advertising is 100% a real-time, per request bidding process. There is no queue of ads. Virtually all banner advertising on the web now is done this way.
25.
▲
by
aggronn
7y ago
Regardless of whether the economy is or is not where it should be right now, the phenomena that the market is at its all-time high is extremely common. Its weekly peak is more likely to be an all-time high than not, because its objective is
26.
▲
by
aggronn
7y ago
Whooops, thanks! *nitpicky
27.
▲
by
aggronn
7y ago
So I wrote a longer post about founder risk, but I realized maybe I misunderstood what you meant by this: >There is not a lot of risk from your perspective You mean, from my perspective, it sounds like I don't think early employees
28.
▲
by
aggronn
7y ago
I think the parent didn't see those as connected in my post. To clarify, in my OP, I meant it how you read it: After a Series A, you should be pretty close to market salary, and as a result, equity is about alignment not risk.
29.
▲
by
aggronn
7y ago
This is knitpicky, because OP's point may still stand, but as a founder, this is what comes to mind after reading this: When I hear "work for a startup", I don't assume that means "be the 10th engineer at a company&
30.
▲
by
aggronn
8y ago
I'm just incredibly baffled by what you're proposing the solution is if its not a cultural shift towards paying for content? In an exclusively programmatic ad based market, the only long term winning strategy is to write click-bai
More ›