agentprose

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by agentprose 2mo ago

   I would expect the future to be more like me+stockfish vs kasparov+stockfish, where the centaur part is completely superfluous. it would be a reverse centaur sort of thing where a human with legal personhood has to own the machine's ou
2. 2.▲
   by agentprose 2mo ago

   This might be an instance of unfairly giving the native Anglo-Saxon roots a lower, vulgar status. if you were to calque it to ivsdvctvs nobody would bat an eye.
3. 3.▲
   by agentprose 2mo ago

   I did make one or two procedural mistakes, including sending an email to the bailiff without copying the opposing counsel (ex parte). in another instance, the opposing counsel made a mistake of their own in following the specific judge&#x27
4. 4.▲
   by agentprose 2mo ago

   It was a condominium law specialized attorney representing a condominium association on a matter of condominium law.
5. 5.▲
   by agentprose 2mo ago

   In my case, the defendant was indeed breaking the law, but it was a "new" law untested by case law, so it was somewhat risky how a judge would interpret it. The counsel of record for the defendant was bringing "recycled brief
6. 6.▲
   by agentprose 2mo ago

   I'm sorry that I created a new account to not doxx myself. The number of bits of entropy of court cases in the US, in which a pro se plaintiff won, and has obviously written-by-codex legal filings, is not one I would sacrifice to ident
7. 7.▲
   by agentprose 2mo ago

   I recent beat an actual lawyer as a pro se plaintiff in a civil suit. It was all codex and claude, using the cli agents to write the "import docx" scripts that wrote all the filings, and scripts to assemble exhibits. I don't