againstapples

8 ms·

1.
by againstapples 3d ago
That’s true, but the issue is still that we don’t have any LLM or any other kind of AI that follows laws perfectly to begin with. If we had AI that did exactly what we told it and nothing else I’d feel much more optimistic about things, I j
2.
by againstapples 3d ago
If we’re considering an LLM advanced enough to actually lower carbon emissions to zero, it is probably capable enough to do things like lobbying against those laws. In any case there’s still the problem of getting to actually do what it’s t
3.
by againstapples 3d ago
There must have been thousands of people who built or did work related to nuclear weapons in the Cold War, people are just really good at rationalising away probabilistic dangers with unclear consequences, especially when there’s a correspo
4.
by againstapples 4d ago
What makes you believe it’s fearmongering and not genuine concern?
5.
by againstapples 4d ago
I’m guessing you make the autocomplete point because you believe there is an upper limit to what that kind of system can achive? Can I ask what the limit would be?
6.
by againstapples 5d ago
Why would we assume AI will learn to solve millennium prize problems but will struggle with the easy part of doing the explaining? I think it’s too easy to predict that models 5 years from now will have the same limitations as the they do n
7.
by againstapples 5d ago
At this rate AI will be doing all of the mathematics within 5 years, I don’t see why a mathematician would be worried about anything other than that at this point?
8.
by againstapples 5d ago
At this rate AI will be doing all of the mathematics within 5 years, I don’t see why a mathematician would be worried about anything other than that at this point?
9.
by againstapples 5d ago
What would be gained with government id that would make this worthwhile? If people are already putting all their personal details into the LLM as well as all their work, do they really need id to know who someone is? Seems more likely they