afuruhed

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by afuruhed 14y ago

   Feedback is welcome.
2. 2.▲
   Blink Protocol, new Native format, updated Compact format(blog.blinkprotocol.org)

   1 points by afuruhed 14y ago|1 comments
3. 3.▲
   by afuruhed 14y ago

   The (maybe only) good thing about there being no reference implementation is that we get feedback on the protocol itself and not the characteristics of a particular implementation. In this first phase, we are providing tools to ease indepen
4. 4.▲
   by afuruhed 14y ago

   Good point. Is it possible to create an unambiguous protocol specification that scales to more complex interactions? If so, and if you know how, I guess you would need a different specification language to get expressiveness? Blink has an
5. 5.▲
   by afuruhed 14y ago

   Wire format - performance. Language describing the format - author friendliness compared to more verbose formats. We are going to release specs for an XML schema format and translations to and from the Blink format. The XML format can be us
6. 6.▲
   by afuruhed 14y ago

   Please have a look at the schema exchange specification. We welcome feedback. It is too costly to include meta data in every message. http://blinkprotocol.org/s/BlinkSchemaExchangeSpec-beta1.pdf Anders
7. 7.▲
   by afuruhed 14y ago

   Hi, I'm going to update the FAQ. We have started comparing to GPB, please see here. http://blog.blinkprotocol.org/2013/01/blink-compared-to-goog... As you can see in a comment by Rolf, part of the perf limitation of GPB is the implementa