afp14

6 ms·

1.
by afp14 2y ago
it works on WSJ, I use it for that site. for some bypasses, it doesn't "just load the page" but rather pops up a link to archive.ph or similar to pull the article, still convenient I also point out there is "bypass payw
2.
by afp14 3y ago
in cali the power company says "you can use this cost structure or that cost structure, your choice!" - so it's this vile little game where if you choose incorrectly they scalp you, and it takes a bit of arithmetic to compute
3.
by afp14 3y ago
It's a matter of scale as far as expense. If my company produces 100,000 cars, and the stalk assembly/parts cost $50, now I've saved 50*100000=5 million dollars a year. To me it's clever in the same way that all-wheel
4.
by afp14 3y ago
I think that's the problem, there aren't hard and fast definitions. I think "economic depression" is an unsettling word, so it keeps switching to "recession" or "slowdown" in the same way that what
5.
by afp14 3y ago
I like presearch.com wholly because they are too young/small to apply these sorts of filters, the results feel "raw" in a good way. I have no affiliation with them and dislike their cryptocurrency based snake oil. But as far
6.
by afp14 3y ago
So here's my hypothesis as to how it works now - and yes I believe this "problematic bias" is baked into the core model - I think they have a "dumb" simple "is this a person" detector stitched onto the end
7.
by afp14 3y ago
As I understand it, in fact 960MW is quite close to 1 jigawatt, which is the typical energy required to power a Delorean-class time machine.
8.
by afp14 3y ago
It's seemingly simple "oh the technician keeps messing up" Did the technician mess up (sometimes true), or were they doing their job in good faith - was it the system/protocol/organization that made the task mistake