adrianparlow

7 ms·

1.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
Send us an email or book a call through our site - we would love to chat!
2.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
This is awesome! 7.6/10 -- we'll take it!
3.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
In our experience they do! The smarter the LLM, the less pre/post-processing you can get away with and still get a good output. So no, you can't just throw raw log data at it, but it doesn't require nearly as much work as it
4.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
Thank you so much for the support! We would always love intros to any lawyers who hate time tracking. We completely agree about supporting large firms, either with on-prem or deployment within their cloud environment.
5.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
We're starting to see more and more of this actually! Some kinds of legal work fit flat fees well -- eg. immigration or company incorporations. Other kinds are highly variable and unpredictable (eg. litigation or anything involving ext
6.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
Thank you! We think it's a less obvious but very useful application for LLMs
7.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
My brain definitely started to experience life in 6 min increments as well, even after just the first few months at a firm! We do have a couple different approaches to filter out non-work. As far as firm management, we think there's a
8.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
Without getting into too much detail, our approach is more metadata-based as screenshots/OCR are pretty noisy and expensive to work with. Shoot me an email if you like, happy to chat! adrian@pointone.ai
9.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
It depends somewhat on the practice area (eg. are you going to court a lot) but we find the vast majority of work is either on the computer, phone/tablet, or listed in the lawyer's calendar
10.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
These are really great points, and data privacy/security is probably the top concern from big firms. Hosting locally is definitely where this is headed for all the reasons you mentioned
11.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
One thing I personally find exciting is that by making attorneys more efficient we can increase the supply of available legal services, which hopefully allows underserved populations more access
12.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
It has, but it's been very hard to accomplish technically prior to modern LLMs
13.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
I think privacy for the end user is really important here, which means letting the user review and edit the time entries generated before they submit to the billing system. Ultimately we view this is a tool to help the end-user
14.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
Thank you for this! Our site copy can definitely use a refresh
15.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
Definitely, works just as well for paralegals and support staff
16.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
Surprisingly, in some cases yes. The most important thing for us is accurately capturing time worked, and then we leave it up to the attorney how much they want to bill vs. write off
17.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
There's been a lot of talk about lawyers shifting off the billable hour model and towards value-based billing. We think fixed fee models will take many years to saturate the market, but things are definitely heading in that direction (
18.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
Yes! We support Windows, MacOS, and some actions on mobile. Trying to track time when you're running from place to place (ie. law firm partners) is super tough
19.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
It's absolutely a tough problem. Right now we have a couple mechanisms to try and address these issues. When we onboard a firm we can ingest their historical billing data, which lets us pattern match the style of new entries. We can al
20.
by adrianparlow 2y ago
It's definitely something we're thinking about. From what we've seen lawyers have some of the most nitty and granular time entries (= highest pain) but it's a problem in any industry that bills hourly.