adlpz

6 ms·

1.
by adlpz 1mo ago
Thanks for this comment. It's an angle worth remembering. A machine is not turing complete, but by running it recursively on its own output, turing completeness emerges. Who knows at what stage of intricacy consciousness emerges? Arg
2.
by adlpz 1mo ago
You sound fun... This is HN. The trip is the destination, bla bla.
3.
by adlpz 2mo ago
Presumably because you've read the first sentence, Telegram Serverless lets you run backend code for your bot and Mini App directly on Telegram's infrastructure , and were interested by the service/proposition enough to keep
4.
by adlpz 2mo ago
Sounds like it's free, so, why the hate? May as well have zero docs. I don't think they're trying to convince you of anything.
5.
by adlpz 3mo ago
Wealth concentration beyond a point which would have resulted in widespread revolution 150 years ago, but that is now being tolerated because we've grown accustomed to a level of comfort we don't want to risk losing.
6.
by adlpz 5mo ago
v0 / Claude Design does this these days. As in, I may be wrong here, but this aesthetic is a good clue that the site was designed by AI. These models seem to love this brutalist high contrast look.
7.
by adlpz 7mo ago
probably at the same stage where a bunch of peptides activating some receptors and triggering the pumping of electrolytes in an out of lipid walls does, i guess
8.
by adlpz 9mo ago
We've never been there. With AI and robotics there may be the slim chance we get closer to that. But we won't. Not because AI, but because humans, of course.
9.
by adlpz 9mo ago
Your comment is nonsensical. Have you ever used any LLM? Ask the LLM to... I don't know, to explain to you the chemistry of aluminium oxides. Do you really think the average human will even get remotely close to the knowledge an
10.
by adlpz 9mo ago
> And LLMs slurped some of those together with the output of thousands of people who’d do the task worse Theoretically fixable, then. > But it can’t. Not definitively and consistently Again, it can't, yet, but with better trainin
11.
by adlpz 9mo ago
I felt literal pain. Not kidding. There's something to investigate here. Made me notice I'm actually exposed to very similar crap on other places. Scary.
12.
by adlpz 9mo ago
Agreed, conceptually. BUT. For 99% of tasks I'm totally certain there's people out there that are orders of magnitude better at them than me. If the AI can regurgitate their thinking, my output is better. Humans may need to th
13.
by adlpz 9mo ago
Thanks for the answer! I've hit those tipping points myself in exactly the same scenarios (OCR and AI). For me, ends up being hacky or just decoupled (independent job runners). Makes sense to have a proper monolith backend for these. C
14.
by adlpz 9mo ago
Cool project! Will surely copy ideas from it :) A general question for the room: where's the tipping point where you need a "proper" backend, in a different language, with all the inconveniences of possible type safety issu
15.
by adlpz 11mo ago
A question for the heavy Emacs users: What's your take on opinionated distros like Doom Emacs or Spacemacs? I've been doing my daily journaling and task management on Emacs for while now, using Doom Emacs. Rationale was that it&#x
16.
by adlpz 11mo ago
Where's the fun in that? :D
17.
by adlpz 11mo ago
Well this goes to show that, as some other commenter said, the gamer community (whatever that is) is indeed very fragmented. I routinely re-play games like Diablo 2 or BG1/2 and I couldn't care less about graphics, voice acting
18.
by adlpz 11mo ago
AFAIK, the electrolyte.
19.
by adlpz 11mo ago
I think it's become a running theme: senior devs who have been coding for a while now are able to extract value from these tools because, even if you don't know Rust, you know how to code . BS code smells the same in any language
20.
by adlpz 11mo ago
I thought this was going to be yet another post about how AI is ruining Junior devs so we'll have a Senior replacement crysis in a few years. It sort of is, indirectly, and I agree with pretty much everything. But the bit about sycopha
21.
by adlpz 11mo ago
As I answered somewhere else, the over-the-top freeloader term I think is justified because OP clearly expects not only to benefit from the work already available, freely, but also to be entitled, for free, to any work and improvement that
22.
by adlpz 11mo ago
Yeah, I agree, it's over the top. I'm just matching the over-the-top language of the original post, which pretty much calls the Datastar devs "disgraceful" and to "f them". I did read the post. I know OP not a
23.
by adlpz 11mo ago
I just come from writing a comment on the other Datastar post on the home page, literally saying that I don't see the point of it and that I don't like it. But I'm now here to defend Datastar. It's their code, which, up
24.
by adlpz 11mo ago
I may be just completely out of my depth here, but I look at the cool example on their website, the Open the pod bay doors, HAL bit, and I don't like it, at all. And reading comments one would think this is some amazing piece of tech
25.
by adlpz 1y ago
You're giving this government, or one in the future, the tools and access they'll need to opress and discriminate against you, a minority.
26.
by adlpz 1y ago
Yeah. Anyone knows about similar resources for, say, the EU? Or it just varies too much by country here?
27.
by adlpz 1y ago
Very cool concept and PoC of both Spotify and vscode integration to learn from. It has opened my mind to a bunch of cool things to do now that I know that the /v1/me/player/currently-playing API endpoint exists. But I&#x
28.
by adlpz 1y ago
This is one of those things that are terrible, but not because the tool is terrible in itself, it's just that the world in which the tool operates is terrible, and the tool just a natural conclusion.
29.
by adlpz 1y ago
Any context on this? I see lots of recent works. Is this just an extension of the sci-hub concept to just everything?
30.
by adlpz 1y ago
Anyone has tried self hosting the server but sending through a third party like Amazon SES?

More ›