adjfasn47573

6 ms·

1.
by adjfasn47573 14d ago
I'm in Germany, in the let's say "people with higher education; good white-collar jobs with enough money for most of my friends to buy or build a house and save money for the future" bubble. Yes, we have heard of MrBeast
2.
by adjfasn47573 1mo ago
I've never said or implied what you're arguing against right now. An LLM building software benefits from using a formal language, formal tests or having a formal specification in a similar way we do. Everything you can formalize i
3.
by adjfasn47573 1mo ago
This is weird I didn't imply or say any of these things that you're arguing against right now.
4.
by adjfasn47573 2mo ago
> A human must verify everything an LLM presents as fact. Everything. I've thought about this for quite some time now. No. A human doesn't need to verify everything. And the argument is really simple: stochastic. Think of self-
5.
by adjfasn47573 3mo ago
mpv
6.
by adjfasn47573 4mo ago
> since leaving one out is a message in itself Side question: why would having a male or female mascot be "a message in itself"? Why do people want to see a message, and especially a $currentDayPolitics one, in every single thi
7.
by adjfasn47573 6mo ago
Ehm... no? It's not zero value? He's making a general point about "regardless of how something is presented to you, at the end of the day you have to look at the actual information, and if there is some truth in it, then it w
8.
by adjfasn47573 6mo ago
> Even if we assume LLMs would consistently generate good enough quality code, code submitted by someone untrusted would still need detailed review for many reasons Wait but under that assumption - LLMs being good enough - wouldn't
9.
by adjfasn47573 7mo ago
Ok but we were talking about users on discord who have to verify their age. I was under the impression that > it can recognize you across visits and build a behavioral profile under your pseudonym is the default Discord experience for us
10.
by adjfasn47573 7mo ago
Sometimes I just bookmark things because I think to myself “Maybe I’ll try this out, when I have time” which then likely never happens. So I wouldn’t give anything on 3k stars at all.
11.
by adjfasn47573 7mo ago
You forgot one (the sane one, which is coming soon anyway): Using a government issued eID system. The EU is going to rollout eID in a way that a site can just ask “is this person > age xy?”. The answer is cryptographically secure in the
12.
by adjfasn47573 1y ago
I see most people stating that the internet as we know it could be gone because of AI. I’m asking you: Why not? The internet is not even a typical human lifespan old. It’s crazy young on a large scale. Why would anyone assume that it will (
13.
by adjfasn47573 1y ago
omg what are you, a sadist?
14.
by adjfasn47573 1y ago
“A recent study in Frontiers in Psychology monitored brain activity in students taking notes and found that those writing by hand had higher levels of electrical activity across a wide range of interconnected brain regions responsible for m
15.
by adjfasn47573 1y ago
I think your comment comes from a very specific point of view. Like software/tech jobs. (Even there you have long term stuff that we all would definitely benefit from). There are so many things where short-term only thinking is counter
16.
by adjfasn47573 2y ago
This. I never read any discussion about the obvious question: Who guarantees that enabling Privacy-Preserving Ad Measurement will keep all the other tracking away from me? No one! I've never read anything at all about the thought proce