additall

8 ms·

1.
by additall 4y ago
I have a rule for reading materials: I read them till the first BS sentence. This one made me stop at: "Most problematic, it’s a behavior that kills people".
2.
by additall 4y ago
Because it's leasing an asset, not owning one.
3.
by additall 4y ago
Well, first of all, it's not "prohibited", it's "prohibited without a consent". Second, less personal data - less useful (relevant) ads, less revenue for Meta - less investment in R&D, less open source&#x2F
4.
by additall 4y ago
But that's solely because media has always been a drug (clickbaits, cognitive tricks, etc.) serving as a power tool. The ones you mentioned, including HN belong one way or another to a "Democratic" party. And all these billio
5.
by additall 4y ago
If a certain law or policy instructs you to jump off the roof immediately, would you necessarily do so? Also, technical means (ads-b) and regulations around accessing the data are two different things, no? Also, why do you have to show that
6.
by additall 4y ago
I'm not sure "free speech" equals "data is public", and I'm not sure that the flight tracking data at least for private jets should be made public at all. Or at least I don't see a difference between priva
7.
by additall 4y ago
But many journalists have crypto assets themselves? :) Let's face it: this whole massive money pie appeared because (mostly educated) people started gambling thinking there's an easy way up. And they do so at scale because becomi
8.
by additall 4y ago
Mo' free lunch paid by "somebody else"! Let's fight inflation together! ;)