ad510

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ad510 9y ago

   special relativity: http://onestick.com/relativity general relativity: http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_42.html quantum electrodynamics: "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter" or
2. 2.▲
   Essay on Realistic Space Combat(forums.spacebattles.com)

   1 points by ad510 10y ago|0 comments
3. 3.▲
   What Quantum Computers Do Faster, with Caveats(twistedoakstudios.com)

   1 points by ad510 10y ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   by ad510 10y ago

   OK, I see what you're saying now. In that case, can you think of a better way of predicting whether you see a 0 or 1 in that situation?
5. 5.▲
   by ad510 10y ago

   Yes, I know that Solomonoff induction is completely impractical for real life machine learning. My point was that if you can survive in the simulation to the point where you see either the 0 or the 1, we don't have any way even in theo
6. 6.▲
   by ad510 10y ago

   Well, I must say that I'm pleasantly surprised with the comments so far. I was actually expecting that this would be quickly shot down as either unoriginal or fundamentally flawed. But instead it seems no one has caught on to what this
7. 7.▲
   by ad510 10y ago

   When I wrote "predict" there, I was referring to whether the predicted probabilities approach the true underlying probabilities, and Solomonoff induction can "predict" a true random number generator in that sense because
8. 8.▲
   What learning algorithms can predict that our physics theories might not(firstestprinciple.com)

   87 points by ad510 10y ago|31 comments