acuteaura

6 ms·

1.
by acuteaura 1mo ago
I should clarify that my doctor explicitly lied to me (found out by requesting my medical file after moving) to shock me on purpose because of his own fifth grade understanding of psychology.
2.
by acuteaura 1mo ago
There is a fine line between being opposed to fat acceptance and thinking performative cruelty works. (It's does not. It made me so much worse. I have nothing but bad things to say about the medical "professional" who catastr
3.
by acuteaura 1mo ago
I don't see the contradiction to what I said or what the prior commenter said. CPU requests still protect you from something using all the resources, because the weights correspond to your number vs all the other pods on that node, and
4.
by acuteaura 1mo ago
Where do you think the contradiction is? A CPU limit of 1 does not prevent an application from using 8 cores worth of compute at once, it just limits the compute to 1 core per 100ms slice on average , and usually that means getting unsched
5.
by acuteaura 1mo ago
Some workloads will also consume all the resources you hand them without being latency sensitive at all. I've handled outages of CPU time available getting suddenly compressed (we were running pod priorities with staging/prod on o
6.
by acuteaura 1mo ago
It's not as much an "overhead" as it will mess up your latency. Limits don't stop you from using available resources until you hit the relative allowance in a CFS window, so a 1 CPU limit on a 32 CPU machine at worst giv
7.
by acuteaura 1mo ago
More literally a Microsoft product. As in, rebadged Azure Pipelines.
8.
by acuteaura 1mo ago
I'm not sure if this is a joke or not, because it has all the signals of a joke, but it might be closer to true than I'd like to admit. At my work, the average quality has gone up with "blindly trusting Opus". The failur
9.
by acuteaura 1mo ago
Oh, what a wonderful shorthand to dismiss an entire article.
10.
by acuteaura 1mo ago
GitHub Actions was always a mess. Because it is a Microsoft product. If you want to have a horrible time, try reading some of the runner code. It's early 2010s-style Windows-First, MSFT C# crud that has trouble not racing several threa
11.
by acuteaura 2mo ago
revolutionary. you can do this with 2 lines of shell code. i do this: https://github.com/acuteaura/universe/blob/main/overlays/cla...
12.
by acuteaura 2mo ago
This is like blaming nicotine addiction on the user and not the nicotine for the purpose of defending nicotine use. How people use AI is a structural problem. Just because you have an easy time using it to learn (good for you, genuinely) do
13.
by acuteaura 2mo ago
I'm not convinced the result will not be "good enough". It looks like one might get away with shipping half-baked shit, just like before, but the speed difference incentivizes it a lot more now. Output quality is not really t
14.
by acuteaura 2mo ago
i consider it intrinsic to the technology. i don't think most people can resist the temptation of feeling a lot more productive than they reasonably can be at the cost of understanding what they're doing (and the fundamental skill
15.
by acuteaura 2mo ago
access to knowledge isn't the problem. if you use models to learn, good for you. people around me use models to replace their critical thinking though, and i consider this a structural issue - with how incentives are laid out at my wor
16.
by acuteaura 2mo ago
AI has a corrosive effect on everything it touches. I go to work and notice that everyone else is on a path to mentally checking out. Nobody values anyone's time anymore, nobody seems to weigh the cost of maintenance or conceptual work
17.
by acuteaura 4y ago
As the reporting party of the much less severe (and much less interesting) TS-2022-003[1] I can confirm that vendor interaction is also swift when not responding would not light the company on fire. In fact there were several other vendors