abss

6 ms·

1.
by abss 1y ago
very good direction!. we have to put science in software asap, it is interesting to see the push back but there is no way we can proceed with the curent approach that ignores that we have computers to help..
2.
by abss 1y ago
You ignore agents and programming with AI. There is huge progress in this topica, it is not that boring...
3.
by abss 2y ago
Seek meaning by helping others, or strive to conquer and shape the world through your will.
4.
Will 2025 Mark the Dawn of the Humanoid Robot Era?
2 points by abss 2y ago|1 comments
5.
by abss 2y ago
But perhaps there is room for optimism: AI holds the potential to manage the complexity that has historically condemned societies to collapse.
6.
by abss 2y ago
Betteridge's Law of Headlines states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by 'no'."
7.
by abss 2y ago
I believe there are indications that suggest the era of big LLMs will come to an end because they will hit a price and performance wall. There is a serious possibility that they will remain an NLP tool, and real thinking will be formalized
8.
by abss 2y ago
Yes, details matter. The whole idea of creating AGI that is simultaneously a generalist seems more and more like wishful thinking. The reality is that to solve real problems, a large number of correct reasoning steps are required, along wit
9.
by abss 2y ago
Interesting, but we have to consider this information with skepticism since it comes from Meta. Additionally, merely open-sourcing models is insufficient; the training data must also be accessible to verify the outcomes. Furthermore, tools
10.
by abss 3y ago
It requires new best practices in governance, and any progress here is difficult. Maybe AI could help.
11.
by abss 3y ago
Let's fix the 'vulnerable distribution channels' issue. Otherwise, reglementing open source AI you just select who can abuse them. There are issues with channels that are too big, focused on making money, and ignoring social
12.
by abss 3y ago
The myth and intuition of a perfect machine being complete is a dominant cultural theme. I recommend Erik J. Larson's book on the myths of artificial intelligence. I see that the fundamental problem with peer review is somewhat broad.
13.
by abss 3y ago
Hehe ;)
14.
Changed My Mind After Reading Larson's "The Myth of Artificial Intelligence"
10 points by abss 3y ago|12 comments
15.
Decentralised Brand Concept [video](youtube.com)
2 points by abss 3y ago|1 comments
16.
by abss 3y ago
This video discusses the evolving concept of decentralized brands, highlighting their growing relevance in an AI and blockchain-driven future. Moving away from traditional, centralized brand governance, this model involves a wider network o
17.
by abss 3y ago
Science inherently concerns itself with understanding and defining limits. However, when it comes to intelligence, there appears to be a significant gap in our grasp of these boundaries. Reflecting on my own thoughts from 35 years ago, I re
18.
by abss 3y ago
This article into reimagining online content moderation, tackling the issue of gatekeeping that often stifles diverse voices on platforms like Wikipedia and social networks. We propose a future where intelligent AI agents, controlled by us
19.
AI and Online Gatekeeping(blog.assistos.net)
2 points by abss 3y ago|2 comments
20.
by abss 3y ago
I see what you mean and I see the risk, but I think we could imagine something beyond this, like having your personal AI judge various contributions and not one from the platforms...
21.
by abss 3y ago
What about implementing a trust-based system, where content aligns with different brands, schools of thought, and value systems? It can revolutionize how we view information. This approach could negate the need for censorship, allowing user
22.
by abss 3y ago
We are entering an era where AI can potentially enhance moderation. How can we ensure it aids rather than hinders? Imagine AI not as a lazy censor, but as a tool capable of discerning the value of diverse contributions. Unlike a Wikipedia e
23.
Is AI Moderation the Solution to Online 'Gatekeeping'
2 points by abss 3y ago|8 comments
24.
Is AI Moderation the Solution to Online 'Gatekeeping'?
1 points by abss 3y ago|0 comments
25.
by abss 3y ago
I completely agree. As the leader of OpenDSU technology, which is used for creating supply chain software and blockchain for businesses, we've seen some success. But a big problem is that many people from large companies don't ful
26.
Perspectives on the Evolution of Licensing in the AI Era. Your Thoughts?(outfinity.medium.com)
1 points by abss 3y ago|1 comments
27.
by abss 3y ago
Summary: Future AI technologies necessitate adapted open-source licenses to ensure alignment with ethical values, enforce transparency, limit autonomy, mandate collaborative development, prepare for potential government regulations, and ba
28.
by abss 3y ago
We're excited to announce the launch of our new research and collaboration project aimed at leveraging blockchain and artificial intelligence technologies to drive social change. Our vision is to create a more equitable and just world
29.
Feedback from the HN Community(outfinity.medium.com)
2 points by abss 3y ago|2 comments
30.
by abss 3y ago
Math and most scientific output is equivalent to some sort of code (automated formal proofs, descriptions of classes of simulators or statistical models,etc) We could envision the tools and "programmming" languages for various dom

More ›