absentmoon

7 ms·

1.
by absentmoon 2y ago
Your comment is definitive but your reference is to a Wikipedia section labelled as "speculation".
2.
by absentmoon 2y ago
What counts as a project in your case? Would you oppose the idea of modules within a project mixing languages? I believe curl is over 500,000 lines of code so in the case of forks a progressive rewrite, module by module seems a lot more ach
3.
by absentmoon 2y ago
I strongly disagree. I don't know the rights around one's own voice, but the idea that you suddenly lose ownership of something because you shared it online is the exact thing that many people take issue with when it is written in
4.
by absentmoon 3y ago
Potential abuse of such powers should not be tolerated regardless of whether one is part of a protected group or not.
5.
by absentmoon 3y ago
Cool, now I can name my internal packages keygen to avoid dependency confusion /s
6.
by absentmoon 3y ago
I assume the bandwidth was too costly. It seems to be archived on Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20230509042606/https://worthdoin...
7.
by absentmoon 3y ago
Did you fill in the form with super compelling use case or something?
8.
by absentmoon 3y ago
They updated it but as soon as you click it the old icon and UX is there?
9.
by absentmoon 3y ago
That would be nice but at least they published their research
10.
by absentmoon 4y ago
Reading this makes me wonder if there is room for something similar to "The Global Chubby Planned Outage". In addition to good comms, they could gradually degrade your service up until suspension as a way of getting your attention
11.
by absentmoon 4y ago
Embeddings are often used as features for these LLMs so before they were paying to generate embeddings and doing inference with these large models. Now they pay to generate embeddings, fine-tune them and do semantic search (probably approxi
12.
Scheduled Messages in Microsoft Teams(support.microsoft.com)
1 points by absentmoon 4y ago|2 comments
13.
by absentmoon 4y ago
It looks like the feature was released in September last year but has not been well publicized.
14.
by absentmoon 4y ago
"any and all testing?". Are you aware of the flat earth movement? For some of their members, no amount of evidence is enough. The goal posts always move. I suspect the same applies here.
15.
by absentmoon 4y ago
Imagine JPMC paying off your debts as part of merger when those debts include the cost of generating fake customers
16.
by absentmoon 4y ago
I'm inclined to agree with the premise of this article but I'm skeptical of the numbers.
17.
by absentmoon 4y ago
Not saying one is better than the other but there were other costs too. Like the people displaced from their homes, the environmental clean up costs, etc.
18.
by absentmoon 4y ago
Pressumably things will start to snowball if these smaller scale trials demonstrate adaquate safety
19.
by absentmoon 4y ago
Playing devil's advocate in Twitter's defense: Is there any public information about how twitter handled the two examples you provided at the end there? Do we know for sure they actively chose not to take any actions? If not, I&#x
20.
Finetuning Stable Diffusion for Text to Pokémon(lambdalabs.com)
2 points by absentmoon 4y ago|0 comments
21.
by absentmoon 4y ago
A less sensational take is also provided by https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o2303
22.
by absentmoon 4y ago
So unnecessary too. Having experience in the domain, like teaching react, lends more creditability than "trust me, I am old".
23.
by absentmoon 4y ago
With the upcoming Apple event, I wonder if this is another case of crushing the competition before Apple releases its own app?