abc20230215

6 ms·

1.
by abc20230215 4y ago
I am guessing it will be a two-class society: one being able to cut off other's access to money when needed.
2.
by abc20230215 4y ago
Beware of what? Let monsters fight. I will side with the one that did not say "don't be evil" back when it was highly convenient.
3.
by abc20230215 4y ago
Bing is like iPhone 1.0 at the first press demo. Google is Blackberry.
4.
by abc20230215 4y ago
It would be good enough to create a pair-programming-free and no-tap-on-shoulder and no-approach-if-in-headphones environment...
5.
by abc20230215 4y ago
Does not even list Lundahl transformers...
6.
by abc20230215 4y ago
Valve talked about that and also self-organising teams, and then they laid off a bunch of people.
7.
by abc20230215 4y ago
I already feel upset about my future interactions with any online support... But as an average "dark matter" enterprise dev, not sure how useful will it be.
8.
by abc20230215 4y ago
Midjourney does not have contextual memory, but it does have a feature to always add a given suffix to any prompt. I guess this is a more powerful variant of the same sort of concept. I wonder who will "win" - specialised models o
9.
by abc20230215 4y ago
Does anyone know what is the difference between Bing/Sydney and ChatGPT3 in terms of "generative power"?
10.
by abc20230215 4y ago
That sounds useful actually. So I could e.g. set up a Harry Potter chat server and make the bot respond only as Dumbledore or only use concepts of that setting? Or a chat server that responds to algorithmic tasks only with Python 3 code usi
11.
by abc20230215 4y ago
Ah, sounds super-niche.
12.
by abc20230215 4y ago
I am getting old: I read the description two times and checked examples yet still don't understand the utility. I do understand Midjourney prompt engineering though.