abc-1

7 ms·

1.
by abc-1 1y ago
[flagged]
2.
by abc-1 1y ago
Right, we have not even solved games in the non-real time environment, so why bother adding additional constraints like “on real hardware in real time”. This is exactly like Tesla trying to switch from LIDAR to cameras before self driving i
3.
by abc-1 1y ago
I understand that. Doing games in real time is just a performance problem that can be solved with more compute or inane optimizations. It’s not interesting research.
4.
by abc-1 1y ago
Anything that mentions tesseract is about 10 years out of date at this point.
5.
by abc-1 1y ago
Surprised these people had to iterate and run these experiments. I thought all of this was common knowledge in books. Maybe it was an experience before this was common knowledge, but it’s not uncommon to see “painfully figure something out
6.
by abc-1 1y ago
Not surprising. They’re almost assuredly trained on reddit data. We should probably call this “the reddit simp bias”.
7.
by abc-1 1y ago
The most annoying thing about Hasan or any other streamer on any point in the political axis is their constant need to have “the right opinion” instead of bringing about any sort of actual change or reduction of suffering. They sit in a roo
8.
by abc-1 1y ago
This is phrenology nonsense and it’s shocking to see people almost nodding along in the comments. This is the same kind of nonsense people spout when they say they’re great interviewers and “just know”, when actual studies show they very mu
9.
by abc-1 1y ago
The goal to automate is to reduce suffering. Full stop. It’s not to “save time”. STEM types like to pretend they’re stoic cold calculating robots and everything is objective and they don’t mind doing some repetitive 5 minute task every day,
10.
by abc-1 1y ago
All the comments reacting with hate because they know, deep down, it’s true. They’re not the main character. Nobody cares about their hyper encrypted nix home server with the perfect firewall setup. And they’re certainly not getting those h
11.
by abc-1 1y ago
It depends. If someone complains about something and then fixes it, I’ll take them over the toxic optimist. There is nothing inherently wrong with complaining, what matters is the intent behind it. A complaint can be constructive, mean, fun
12.
by abc-1 1y ago
https://chatgpt.com/share/680ae04a-e360-8004-88fc-8426e8e700...
13.
by abc-1 1y ago
Hahaha they’re cooked. GPT 4.5 was a massive flop. GPT 4.1 is barely an improvement after over a year. Now they’re grasping at straws. Anyone actually in this field who wasn’t a grifter knew improvements are sigmoidal. All the original tale
14.
by abc-1 1y ago
> Pure, unadulterated, revolting whining from a spoiled tech child. As opposed to you, the perfect human? > blue collar jobs would take much longer to recover So what are you saying? We should treat everyone like shit so everyone is e
15.
by abc-1 1y ago
Darn I wonder if systems could be modified so that common mistakes become less common or if documentation could be written once and read multiple times by different people.
16.
by abc-1 1y ago
Is it really losing them money if investors throw fistfuls of cash at them for it
17.
by abc-1 1y ago
The owner of Gumroad is a millionaire, but for some reason decided to crank up the cost of charges from 2.9% to 12.9% a few years ago. Needless to say, most people who don’t like being screwed switched to Stripe or another provider. That’s
18.
by abc-1 1y ago
I just want to fine tune deepseek v3 chat but it’s not possible or easy for regular consumers
19.
by abc-1 1y ago
Neat. Maybe you guys should make a fine tuning platform for deepseek specifically, with a fine tune API similar to openAIs. You could expand out into hosting those models too.
20.
by abc-1 1y ago
[flagged]
21.
by abc-1 2y ago
There are companies out there that probably do none of these things and are x1000 more successful from a revenue or market cap perspective. Seems like the biggest successes are simply being at the right place at the right time and not being
22.
by abc-1 2y ago
Respect for standing up for what he believes in. A lot of people in this industry would have no problem building drones that bomb children if it gave them a good “total comp”.
23.
by abc-1 2y ago
This is a sign of the beginning of the end for them. When you’re rotten to the core you do things like this instead of actually innovating and creating new great products. It doesn’t end well long term.
24.
by abc-1 2y ago
So his timing was slightly off. I don’t know why people expected LLMs to improve exponentially. Your iPhone now doesn’t look much different than the one 10 years ago. GPT-3 or arguably GPT-4 was the first iPhone moment, everything else will
25.
by abc-1 2y ago
I refuse to listen to anyone who has done nothing in life but maximize their wealth and power, play corporate political games, and grift investors for all they're worth. Shame the actual innovators don't blog much, usually because
26.
by abc-1 2y ago
Why do people keep talking about this? We get it, Chinese models are censored by CCP law. Can we stop talking about it now? I swear this must be some sort of psyop at this point.
27.
by abc-1 2y ago
I was apprehensive at first, but it seems like it works for them and they make some interesting points.
28.
by abc-1 2y ago
I don’t know if this is satire or not, but all research shows bullying to be extremely harmful to youth.
29.
by abc-1 2y ago
I always feel like these manager types have drunk deeply from the koolaid for some reason. It’s a lot of words and processes that they usually cargo culted from somewhere else. A lot of it seems to boil down to “don’t be an idiot” and “actu
30.
by abc-1 2y ago
As opposed to your in-house code which is vulnerability free? The issue isn’t vulnerability's, it’s dependency hell where all your packages are constantly fighting each other for specific versions. Although some languages handle this b

More ›