aadraple

7 ms·

1.
by aadraple 9mo ago
Here's a great X thread with additional reporting giving an inside look on this: https://x.com/ROSSIntel/status/2006429363034824709?s=20
2.
by aadraple 11y ago
Agreed. It's an absolute tragedy that 80 percent of the legal needs of the poor go unmet.
3.
by aadraple 11y ago
Well, if the public defender doesn't know Spanish using software which helps them to understand their client is a start. I definitely agree with you on just how bad existing legal research software is at finding factually on-point resu
4.
by aadraple 11y ago
Agreed. Measurable improvements means data that could not be refuted which is key. Check out Clio for project management, Beagle for contract review, Ironclad for automating contract creation, Legaler for better lawyer-client communication,
5.
by aadraple 11y ago
Perhaps legal technologies in their current forms are not as applicable to the work public defenders do but to say all LegalTech is inapplicable to the work public defenders do is a stretch. To use your example, you could actually build tec
6.
by aadraple 11y ago
We both agree that the decision makers have to increase funding public defenders and that their numbers should not be reduced with the uptake of technology. This dilution would simply bring us back to square one. It’s about augmenting with
7.
by aadraple 11y ago
The justice system is deeply flawed but technology can help repair it. Let me explain. Legal work can be split up into two buckets – process based work and advisory work. The advisory work revolves around analysis, comparison and collaborat