aaardvark

6 ms·

1.
by aaardvark 11y ago
On a risk-adjusted basis, that's a pretty mediocre return.
2.
by aaardvark 11y ago
They're selling single-stock/index options?
3.
Why is YCombinator backing Vest?
1 points by aaardvark 11y ago|1 comments
4.
by aaardvark 11y ago
Don't start with the tone-policing, OP has addressed all the above questions in a reasonable manner.
5.
by aaardvark 11y ago
What does the Yangtzee River tragedy have to do with Citizens United?
6.
by aaardvark 11y ago
Just a joke, lighten up.
7.
by aaardvark 11y ago
"As an American" has apparently become a euphemism for "I know nothing about the subject, so explain this to me like you would to a small child".
8.
by aaardvark 11y ago
It's kind of rude when talking to someone or in a meeting, otherwise not a big deal.
9.
by aaardvark 11y ago
It's highly unusual to see someone for 6 months and not realize that they're still living with their spouse and kids. Even if the other person tells you it's not the case.
10.
by aaardvark 11y ago
Not particularly remarkable news but good for her I suppose. Being the CFO for a big Investment Bank is pretty much the most stressful job imaginable.
11.
by aaardvark 12y ago
>But to claim that Stimulants are the only cognitive enhancers especially when you seem to've done some basic research... why? >Now - to your point: are any of these life changing? In damaged individuals, perhaps. Alas like you s
12.
by aaardvark 12y ago
Originally came across it [here]( http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/04/not-content-with-enormou... ), more click-baity but pretty disturbing nonetheless.
13.
Oregon's solar program mess: fraud, bankruptcy and prison labor(oregonlive.com)
1 points by aaardvark 12y ago|1 comments
14.
by aaardvark 12y ago
Garbage article. There are no "brain enhancers", only stimulants, both commonly used (coffee, tea etc) and pharmaceutical (amphetamines et al). Look up Bacopa on examine.com, specifically the studies on Memory Enhancement. For the
15.
by aaardvark 12y ago
But buying one share of a publically traded company makes it worth number of shares * value of share?
16.
by aaardvark 12y ago
> Practially speaking, design is legally indefensible as intellectual property Really? Isn't there any IP protection for a websites look-and-feel? Need some lawyers to opine on this.