_quick_q

6 ms·

1.
by _quick_q 10y ago
Sure, but _why_? What benefits do you see that having over this? (Pre-pending an 'f' to a string)
2.
by _quick_q 10y ago
Could you expand? This looks similar to how it is done in Rust.
3.
by _quick_q 10y ago
Why would you want that?
4.
by _quick_q 10y ago
Maybe. Better late than never, though?
5.
by _quick_q 10y ago
I understand the sentence. What I don't understand is why it is necessary for a support agent to have completed first year business school and why this is an insult (which I take as the intent).
6.
by _quick_q 10y ago
What does this even mean? "...who and I do mean this harshly, sounded like they didn't pass first year business school."
7.
by _quick_q 10y ago
I think you may have missed the sarcasm in the parent post.
8.
by _quick_q 10y ago
Your original comment seems very much to suggest anything but that you believe it is the wrong person. That is the source of my confusion and I think possibly the others that replied.
9.
by _quick_q 10y ago
I'm confused by your comment. The article mentions an entirely different person (now deceased) with that name ( Peter Doige ) and his sister has supported the whereabouts (high school, prison, etc). Are you suggesting that the painting
10.
by _quick_q 10y ago
>> Use gmail or Google Apps. Things just work. Cede control to Google. Google is not without its problems. Just now on HN, in fact: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12008365
11.
by _quick_q 10y ago
From the article: >> It’s possible that some data is backed up at local bases where investigations originated.
12.
by _quick_q 10y ago
That's why BIG SERIAL exists. :-)
13.
by _quick_q 10y ago
I think another valuable point to consider that may actually may understate popularity of those younger than 25 is that this is only looking at phone calls. I'm not under 25 anymore, but I think they generally use their phones for text
14.
by _quick_q 10y ago
>> This is when you're most popular, according to science One study == "according to science"
15.
by _quick_q 10y ago
I understand, but that was not the point of my comment.
16.
by _quick_q 10y ago
They were responding to the comment where "9AM EST" was explicitly used. I don't understand the value of your comment as it doesn't serve to clarify - I think most if not all readers would understand the reference.
17.
by _quick_q 10y ago
Amen. I interviewed with a company that touted a "No Jerks Policy". Both the HR recruiter and the CEO bragged to me about how they have and will fire "jerks" on the spot. I ran far away from that job after the interview.
18.
by _quick_q 10y ago
Where are you finding that?