_luci_

7 ms·

1.
by _luci_ 1mo ago
Understandable, who can afford to risk their livelihood just to tell a dumbass he's being a dumbass :p it's not like the C-suites will listen anyway
2.
by _luci_ 1mo ago
So we should not own pets, because the real polluters (companies) are lobbying to keep polluting? What bothers me so much about this idea of individual responsibility is that we get blamed for a choice we couldn't possibly make. It is
3.
by _luci_ 1mo ago
Id argue that auto refresh is more a successor than an evolution!
4.
by _luci_ 1mo ago
That is genuinely gross, I'm assuming it's just ragebait or something haha who actually thinks like this!
5.
by _luci_ 1mo ago
I consented to PEOPLE reading it. How could I have predicted that AI would take off so rapidly and get trained on my repos? How could I have predicted that AI would be trained on code without a license attached, or on code with strict licen
6.
by _luci_ 1mo ago
100% agreed, especially that last line. What I do not understand is why so many people are entirely okay with this change. I'm not interested in working with LLM's and after having been forced to work with LLM's at my current
7.
by _luci_ 1mo ago
Yeah you're right, it IS entirely fair to suddenly and quickly push the group that built your industry out of the industry. They should all just find new jobs, because that's very easy and simple. Thankfully we have bright minds l
8.
by _luci_ 1mo ago
I think you missed the entire point of this discussion, but you also have a very gross view of the world! > Somehow purists think there's something wrong with the process of that. I say there's something wrong with them, perhap
9.
by _luci_ 1mo ago
why would you want to filter these people out? surely those that consider programming more than just a "means to an end" are going to be much more valuable employees, consider they are much more likely to be skilled at their craft