_kulang

5 ms·

1.
by _kulang 27d ago
Why argue with it? Why not just edit the memory yourself?
2.
by _kulang 29d ago
I have quite a bit of success with Claude on Jira tickets as long as the tasks are scoped well. Put effort into the ticket, and fire Claude at the ticket with MCP. I essentially review the PR. But this is only possible because I have create
3.
by _kulang 1mo ago
It’s the theory of colour charge essentially, counterpart to electrodynamics. Quarks have colour, rather than electrical charge. Mediating particle is the gluon, analogous to (but entirely different from) the photon
4.
by _kulang 1mo ago
Sure – but I’m entitled to make a judgement on what I consider to be “good” and “bad” output from an LLM, where “good” just means “helpful to my process”.
5.
by _kulang 1mo ago
Claude is certainly able to make a superhuman mess. All of its efficacy still hinges upon good architecture and programming principles, which do not seem to be instilled in the model by anything other than luck
6.
by _kulang 1mo ago
I moved to Sol for my writing and it is so so much better. But it makes more mistakes. I think they have different ideas of product but it seems OpenAI is going to follow Anthropic’s lead over the next year. I think I am going to put more e
7.
by _kulang 1mo ago
Adjusting for sample/population age is the simplest interpretation of that
8.
by _kulang 1mo ago
I saw a great video on YouTube by languagejones, and he asks: do we have to tell the difference between an LLM and an idiot? The writing is just bad. I think this is clear to everyone, so I guess we could stop at that
9.
by _kulang 1mo ago
This looks cool, and I might use it to make use of my Clara BW (which I bought to read on and realised I liked actual books a lot more) About the readme though: the AI-generated text is perfectly serviceable, but definitely generated with m
10.
by _kulang 2mo ago
For whatever reason, the photo is point. People are only doing it for the photo and only doing the photo for the competition. I agree that we lost something, I just also think a majority of people don’t know what’s missing: they just put ef
11.
by _kulang 2mo ago
This reads like the author attempted to prompt an AI not to write like an AI. Normally, I do not care if a blog post is AI written, but in this case I could not follow the result
12.
by _kulang 2mo ago
These are nice if you are scientifically literate but I suspect not so great for the lay
13.
by _kulang 3mo ago
Sounds like you either had a fake or more likely, couldn’t fit them properly
14.
by _kulang 3mo ago
Not everyone is duplicitous, and it’s not surprising that the experts on a technology work at a company that creates the technology. I assume you’d think the study was valid if the Moderna staff were testing a Pfizer vaccine?
15.
by _kulang 3mo ago
I think CS degrees are a bit light on classical theory in the modern day. In Australia CS degrees are what they say on the tin, but in America it seems almost as if CS degrees are anywhere from cybernetics to pure software development
16.
by _kulang 3mo ago
It’s very intuitively appealing. We like it at my university for teaching first years how to build a line following robot. It’s one of the first times you can get students to really get that “ah” moment when they realise what they can do wi
17.
by _kulang 3mo ago
The fascination of programmer types with classical control and estimation topics is endlessly interesting as someone who studied control and estimation and hangs out here for interest in the programming. For me it was surprising to see that
18.
by _kulang 3mo ago
Thermodynamically, heat is waste energy. EVs are so efficient that scavenging isn’t practical anymore; I’m not sure the temperature gets high enough to usefully extract the heat energy for heating. ICE cars obviously produce mostly heat s
19.
by _kulang 3mo ago
Look. Academia is also tertiary education. To have teachers not practice a diversity mindset is to the detriment of all else. Tolerance of intolerance is not tolerance at all. I think the mistake you make is attributing all of this to ide
20.
by _kulang 3mo ago
It’s a near-doubling of energy loss - probably a healthier way to understand it when the efficiencies are all 90%+
21.
by _kulang 4mo ago
“Choice” is funny because consumers never choose what the products are, only from the existing products. People harp on choice as a boon for windows laptops but you cannot choose an affordable laptop with great build quality and speed and b
22.
by _kulang 4mo ago
And you’d need the conventional jet to survive
23.
by _kulang 4mo ago
As an Australian, I am not sure that most work done in this country adds to productivity
24.
by _kulang 4mo ago
I think we’ve seen the decline of the USA and have already moved on without them. Not everything important is US-centric and about AI and oil
25.
by _kulang 5mo ago
Counter signalling is a powerful thing; I think your comment will be appreciated because it is clearly written by a human
26.
by _kulang 5mo ago
It’s also hard to develop taste in an environment flooded with content. I am not sure how much of that is AI writing getting better, and how much of that is just a lack of taste from the newest members
27.
by _kulang 5mo ago
Ehh I get the point, but also: * people want stable answers from AI, which is pretty much regression to the mean * there is a safety element in there, not agreeing with the user every time is easiest if large institutions are leant on, te
28.
by _kulang 5mo ago
Perhaps you are unaware, but the great wave is a wood block print. That’s not to say that the strokes aren’t amazing, but they didn’t need to be created in one pass
29.
by _kulang 5mo ago
I think they mean that everyone in the orchestra does not get a Stradivarius
30.
by _kulang 5mo ago
I just feel like this problem is something where unfettered capitalism does not work. What we are discussing here is a public utility, and should be managed as such

More ›