_justpassingby_

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by _justpassingby_ 8y ago

   > We force him to try everything we put on his plate. As long as a child is receiving adequate nutrition, is it necessary to force him to expand his culinary horizons? Natural curiosity tends to balance out temporary fixation in the abse
2. 2.▲
   by _justpassingby_ 8y ago

   It's scary to think what that background stress is doing as the years roll on. I imagine having that whole weight lifted... and then I read articles like this. Maybe we're all doomed. Call the Buddhists.
3. 3.▲
   by _justpassingby_ 8y ago

   Latest Gmail is, indeed, a piece of shit. I think it's for the same reason a lot of websites now are (including my university's course portal): everyone is using frameworks that purport to work just as good on mobile as desktop bu
4. 4.▲
   by _justpassingby_ 8y ago

   Not necessarily. It's not outrageous for a large system to incorporate different scopes, even simultaneously. The architecture of the internet itself is a good example of that.
5. 5.▲
   by _justpassingby_ 8y ago

   Just what was the point of giving his backstory?
6. 6.▲
   by _justpassingby_ 9y ago

   Yes. I would assume- based on the exponential nature of wealth distribution- that you would get exponentially more people willing to spend as the amount lowers.