_glsb

5 ms·

1.
by _glsb 3y ago
> This is an illusion. The search “site: https://news.ycombinator.com/front Qunanbaiuly” (major Kazakh author) yields no results. The search “site: https://news.ycombinator.com/front Shevchenko” (major Ukr
2.
by _glsb 3y ago
[flagged]
3.
by _glsb 3y ago
Hey.com solved the problem pretty easily: just have a positive list of email addresses that reach your inbox and the rest are sent to a screener folder.
4.
by _glsb 3y ago
Where do they commit this money? As in: what does it pay for exactly?
5.
by _glsb 3y ago
It's only a jump if you deliberately ignore what russians themselves are saying. As I've mentioned somewhere else in this thread, russian government and russian mass media outright call for ethnic cleansing. Putin in his speech at
6.
by _glsb 3y ago
Binance is not the financial industry.
7.
by _glsb 4y ago
the only thing the negative voting on this comment shows is the utter lack of understanding of econ or governance topics by HN commenters.
8.
Teenage suicide rates dropped during lockdown due to respite from bullying(economist.com)
54 points by _glsb 4y ago|42 comments
9.
by _glsb 4y ago
You're talking about the Paradox of tolerance. I don't see why it is necessary to provide a democratic platform to undemocratic or misanthropic ideologies. I think it's misguided purism.
10.
by _glsb 4y ago
"Superstate" is not a thing unless the five participants in the "5-eye" intelligence sharing program actually agree to form a state. So to stick with your logic, Assange should be responsible for leaking Australian thing
11.
by _glsb 4y ago
Most tankies are just LARPing as romanticized version of revolutionistas of the 50s and the 60s. They need a morally simple world view. Completely agree with you.
12.
by _glsb 4y ago
Again, problems with basic communication, it seems. Perpetuity means "forever". Because they have a finite amount of money and they are not generating money, they can't "fund wikipedia in perpetuity several times over&qu
13.
by _glsb 4y ago
That they are a non-profit funded by donations, maybe? Just a wild guess. /s
14.
by _glsb 4y ago
I mean, it's basic English. "Independence" doesn't mean "just enough for server maintenance" and "thriving" doesn't mean "barely surviving".
15.
by _glsb 4y ago
They don't though. The banner has a whiny tone, but never do they say that they are struggling to keep the site up.
16.
by _glsb 4y ago
Wait, so you're just going to ignore each point of mine every time I give you evidence and switch to something else? Because right now it looks to me like you're saying "Ignore what you know, pay attention only to the article
17.
by _glsb 4y ago
Then sort it out. Telling you guys to sort your country out is not "genocide".
18.
by _glsb 4y ago
That's not what I claim. I claim that there is a history of fascism in russia that has been so common place that people stopped noticing it. This can be exemplified by a number of things: - Treatment of minority cultures (Finland as a
19.
by _glsb 4y ago
> Who cares about it's recent political pivoting? People who vote for them. You have zero evidence that the regiment follows a neonazi agenda. Neither does the National Guard, the Army, nor the government. Not to mention that Azov i
20.
by _glsb 4y ago
No. I said elsewhere that a good example is Finland. Your whataboutism isn't helpful.
21.
by _glsb 4y ago
Cool genocide denial, bro.
22.
by _glsb 4y ago
Russia has "filtration camps" right now. China commits genocide against the Uyghurs. I'd say _that's_ a baseline for calling someone a terrorist. USA is marginally better.
23.
by _glsb 4y ago
Individual productivity is not a metric to optimize for in an org.
24.
by _glsb 4y ago
The point of spammers or ransom ware authors is to survive as well. Doesn’t mean they are valuable. If you say that russian culture is valuable, you must set the context why. It doesn’t communicate anything particularly original. It’s not e
25.
by _glsb 4y ago
I think it’s important to understand that russian culture has failed. If it can’t guide a nation towards humanistic values, what is a culture’s point?
26.
by _glsb 4y ago
That problem is easily solved with client-side whitelists (ala hey.com). However, that would also mean the death of all "legitimate" marketing emails. All the hoops you have to jump through are there either as a form of identity v