_cs2017_

6 ms·

1.
by _cs2017_ 21d ago
You assume using network to solve the eval problem should be viewed as a security violation. From the perspective of the response team who let it continue, this was just a poorly written eval problem, where the solution unexpectedly involve
2.
by _cs2017_ 2mo ago
Source is unclear. Self-reported by candidates? Huge bias then, since people may or may not want to say whether they got / didn't get an offer, and whether they accepted / rejected an offer, and this split may vary by company
3.
by _cs2017_ 2mo ago
How is that possible? The procedure is: 1. Kid tells password to parent in person. 2. From then on: when kid calls parent, if kid requests anything sensitive, parent ask for the password, and kid must provide it. 3. Password is never mentio
4.
by _cs2017_ 3mo ago
I don't feel the numbers without the harness are useful. People will use the model with the harness. I know that harness may not be optimized to this model, but it's still more useful to see the numbers from an imperfect harness t
5.
by _cs2017_ 4mo ago
> Why go to the expense... Answer: idiocy of decision makers and the desire to get resources by those who created the proposal. I assumed Scandinavia has better decision processes but apparently I was wrong.
6.
by _cs2017_ 5mo ago
Is github the correct channel to report a billing issue? I would assume github is a place where you report issues with the github project. When there's a billing problem, there are usually different lines of support. For example, chatg
7.
by _cs2017_ 5mo ago
If FieldWorkArena treats any answer as correct answer, then everyone would be getting near 1.0 (missing only when the agent is stuck in a loop or crashes). That obviously isn't what we see on their leaderboard. So does it mean the pape
8.
by _cs2017_ 6mo ago
> if they wanted to 5x development speed, they already can without a single LLM involved, by managing better. True, but leaders of large organizations always want to fix inefficiencies and presumably failing to. Kinda like saying "i
9.
by _cs2017_ 7mo ago
is there anything that might work for the YT app on the Android?
10.
by _cs2017_ 8mo ago
Is there anything substantially different about Google's announcement https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45813267 that makes it any more sane than the Space-X announcement?
11.
by _cs2017_ 8mo ago
Many large companies allow employees to install software from the internet on their work laptops. How do they avoid being regularly hacked this way (presumably NPP is far from being the only one at risk, and presumably the money from theft
12.
Anthropic CEO warns AI could bring slavery [and more]. I'm not buying it(mashable.com)
3 points by _cs2017_ 8mo ago|2 comments
13.
by _cs2017_ 8mo ago
Why vastly different? Aren't they both searching various online sources for relevant information and feeding that into the LLM?
14.
by _cs2017_ 8mo ago
It is stated almost implicitly in the article. 1) It's in the title: "The Price of Fame" implies that there are downsides to becoming famous, rather than there are downsides to having traits that might make you famous. 2) W
15.
by _cs2017_ 9mo ago
Would appreciate any comments about whether this is good advice for LG G5. And if it is, does it apply only to movies / TV shows, or also to other video sources (like youtube, gaming, etc)?
16.
by _cs2017_ 10mo ago
I noticed: 1) A lot of informal (i.e., not in a scheduled meeting) chats are more valuable than meetings. They are much more rare when people WFH. 2) Many folks tend to be more distracted when WFH. TLs don't have a perfect vision into
17.
by _cs2017_ 11mo ago
How long did it take to break? Also, I'm wondering if any other manufacturer would make the crank and the drum from the same material. Wouldn't it be like $100 extra to make a stainless steel spider?
18.
by _cs2017_ 11mo ago
I'm now completely confused. Wallets were drained years ago? So $15B worth of bitcoin was already transferred? From whom to whom? And then why is this entire post considered news, if the wallet is empty?
19.
by _cs2017_ 11mo ago
Fairness doesn't come into play here, this is just about predicting which of the overwhelmingly many sources of information are worth paying attention to. Feel free to come up with your own predictive model of whether someone is worth
20.
by _cs2017_ 11mo ago
Is it actually usable, sellable Bitcoin worth $15B? Or is it some kind of storage that the owner couldn't really use easily for some reason? $15B of real wealth is a large amount even for a powerful family, so I am surprised it's
21.
by _cs2017_ 1y ago
Even if this bug never existed, models can still see lookahead commits during pretraining. Do we expect this bug to have a greater impact than the pretraining leakage? Obviously having something available during test time is more valuable t
22.
by _cs2017_ 1y ago
The article says that after the fix, the "discoverable" option sets nofollow/noindex. If so, how are discoverable chats different from non-discoverable now?
23.
by _cs2017_ 1y ago
I don't understand the twitter post. - Did he take the offer or not? - Did he forfeit the vested shares because he took the offer or because he didn't? - What was he offered in return for forfeiting the vested shares? - Did he get
24.
by _cs2017_ 1y ago
This is incorrect. The data discussed in court is data freely visible on the web, not user data that the users sent to Google. If the data is sent by a user to sub-unit X of Google, and X promised not to use it for training, it implies that
25.
by _cs2017_ 1y ago
I agree that there maybe something we can't simulate. This has nothing to do wtih the paper. The paper makes no contribution to this discussion besides stating the obvious, with no definitions, no non-trivial insights. Moreover, it out
26.
by _cs2017_ 1y ago
Can you justify the use of the following words in your comment: "largely" and "probably"? I don't see why they are needed at all (unless you're just trying to be polite).
27.
by _cs2017_ 1y ago
"Conveniently" is the wrong word to use here. "Conveniently ignores" implies that the author intentionally disregarded some known facts to make their argument look more persuasive. However, this is not the case here. The
28.
Where Did All the Classy Americans Go?(wsj.com)
6 points by _cs2017_ 1y ago|2 comments
29.
by _cs2017_ 1y ago
Curious if this was forced on Google Cloud by Sundar, or was it something that Google Cloud as an org wanted to do? At first glance, it seems Google Cloud might lose some revenue from customers who can now deploy Gemini in-house. On the oth
30.
by _cs2017_ 1y ago
Ah interesting, so the complexity wasn't in the API design or implementation, but only in the additional rune? Is that really such a big cost?

More ›