_c5eq

7 ms·

1.
by _c5eq 4y ago
Rather, it's both. The government folk want it gone from theirs, but they want the rest of us to have it. Thus the claim "Our users want it" is true, in a tongue in cheek way.
2.
by _c5eq 4y ago
I originally replied to you with a long comment, but I saw that I angered the mob. I think I'm done with this site.
3.
by _c5eq 4y ago
Can't read the article, cause NYTimes paywall.(And I don't use methods to get around it, cause that's technically stealing; and I refuse to pay for NYTimes.) But here's a comment based upon the pretense of the title at l
4.
by _c5eq 4y ago
Obligatory proper definition for those who might require it, cause even I didn't know what the anagram SIM meant. > Subscriber Identity Module
5.
by _c5eq 4y ago
Well, 1. I never said it would happen quickly. Thing is, humans are rather impatient generally speaking. Especially when they think they are correct about something and must spread the enlightenment of their ego unto others. Time, doesn&#x2
6.
by _c5eq 4y ago
It's that, and more. It's also that they want to be able to rely on being able to call you in at any moments notice without any potential for excuses like "Well, it's going to take an hour to get there, because of the bu
7.
by _c5eq 4y ago
Fair enough I suppose. That said, I personally would rather delete a comment that potentially has a brigade incoming towards it while I still can, than wait too long and suffer the consequences of malicious people. I mean, I still have the
8.
by _c5eq 4y ago
I think we overall agree then, it's just that society has become the 'walking on eggshells' part of your comment, in an attempt to not be sociopathic, which is part of the problem I am describing; just in different words. In
9.
by _c5eq 4y ago
In response to the edit I must have missed. 1. Crime rates reduced: I mean, of course they did. It was not longer a crime to be using those drugs, so there was no reason to be arresting people for possessing them. I don't know about yo