Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
_3yjt
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
1.
▲
by
_3yjt
1y ago
Edit: I dropped the points on the details, just to focus on the main point. Rest assured that I read the paper, I was arguing in good faith, and that after a bit more thinking I understand your criticism of my interpretation. I don’t think
2.
▲
by
_3yjt
1y ago
The paper's motivation is to explore the new coded display, and they are doing that by exploring an aspect that they care about. That aspect is very specifically well-defined, and if you want to show whether a display has the same effe
3.
▲
by
_3yjt
1y ago
That is just the motivation, the experiment is much more general and is not related to display technology: > The work presented here attempts to clarify “the rate at which human perception cannot distinguish between modulated light and a
4.
▲
by
_3yjt
1y ago
What they are trying to do is recreating the situation that is more similar to actual light sources in computer screens and TV (varying flickering rate from different pixels/ areas). They are saying that the current threshold of 65Hz c
5.
▲
by
_3yjt
1y ago
Here is one: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07861 They mentioned in Results section: > For the median viewer, flicker artifacts disappear only over 500 Hz, many times the commonly reported flicker fusion rate.
6.
▲
by
_3yjt
1y ago
Look, they sourced their claims (quite literally, they put how they calculate, from which standard). And linking to the correct document is literally how scientific citation works — I replied the page to you above anyway. If you want to red
7.
▲
by
_3yjt
1y ago
31 and 32 (by the printed page number), in pdf it’s 42
8.
▲
by
_3yjt
1y ago
See my comment on the other reply. > Either there's a study showing that 246 Hz flickering poses "Extremely High" health risks or there isn't. They calculated it using the definition from the standard.
9.
▲
by
_3yjt
1y ago
The “very/moderate high” comes from the standard itself, which is quantified within the standard. In the context, it is about the probability of having issues, while the effect (mild to catastrophic) is another axis. Considering that
10.
▲
by
_3yjt
1y ago
IEEE Recommended Practices for Modulating Current in High-Brightness LEDs for Mitigating Health Risks to Viewers : https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/1789/4479/ There is nothing anecdote about flickering in LED