ZetsuBouKyo

6 ms·

1.
by ZetsuBouKyo 3mo ago
I feel the exact same way. Haven't those government officials who voted for these laws ever considered that, one day, their own family members or closest friends might appear on a leaked list on the dark net? I don't believe these
2.
by ZetsuBouKyo 3mo ago
The US government's operations are so unreasonable that I suspect the content of previous collaboration between the US and Anthropic might have been trained into the Fable model. Some conversations could have leaked information, which
3.
by ZetsuBouKyo 3mo ago
It’s just impossible. Look at real-life stuff like laws, company policies, or school rules. Humans have to enforce them, and we constantly see crazy cases in the news. There’s no way simple rules can ever make speech completely 'safe.&
4.
by ZetsuBouKyo 4mo ago
I am relatively pessimistic about the profitability of those panning for gold in the downstream AI market. The core bottlenecks are power and computing capacity, and they actually trace back to the exact same issue. It all comes down to the
5.
by ZetsuBouKyo 4mo ago
For people who think often, ad is only useful in very few situations. The ability to think often is ultimately a capability that only a minority of humans possess. Therefore, for the vast majority of people, ad is very useful. For example,
6.
by ZetsuBouKyo 4mo ago
Operating in these countries helps gather information in them.
7.
by ZetsuBouKyo 4mo ago
The ban is meant to protect kids, but secondhand smoke is almost everywhere.
8.
by ZetsuBouKyo 4mo ago
I remember a joke where a guy sent a joke to another via private message, and Xi Jinping laughed. It seems the government's mindset is the same everywhere.
9.
by ZetsuBouKyo 4mo ago
I have an extreme slippery slope idea. If they want to protect children, shouldn't they sterilize everyone? Every child born, regardless of wealth will inevitably suffer injury, illness, and psychological setbacks. Therefore, the best
10.
by ZetsuBouKyo 4mo ago
According to the current shortage of computing power and electricity, I suspect that what they really want is not your data, but the computing power and electricity from your device. If users' behaviors can be pre-labeled on their own
11.
by ZetsuBouKyo 4mo ago
I think automatic updates that offer no easy way to refuse are completely unreasonable. Can you imagine going to see a doctor, and in the middle of your appointment, the doctor drags you into the operating room to automatically update your
12.
by ZetsuBouKyo 4mo ago
Hey, you got the point. Is there a chance that Google actually plans to use users' computers as their edge computing devices?
13.
by ZetsuBouKyo 4mo ago
I agree to install it, but I don’t agree to automatic updates. The bigger problem is, I can hardly find where to disable Google’s automatic updates. In the end, I just locked the file permissions to stop that virus-like auto-update program
14.
by ZetsuBouKyo 5mo ago
One day, I hope to see servers walking around with cameras, recording customers' reactions to the food for the chefs' feedback.
15.
by ZetsuBouKyo 5mo ago
Strictly speaking, any software that cannot easily and permanently disable forced updates is insecure. So, I don't like auto-updating.
16.
by ZetsuBouKyo 6mo ago
it's probably best to go with client-side encryption and share keys with friends privately. that pretty much fixes all the privacy issues after the initial registration, but maintaining that extension with all the company and their upd
17.
by ZetsuBouKyo 7mo ago
to take control of your own content while preventing it from being harvested for ai training, there’s a straightforward method. - use a browser extension to encrypt comments sent to any social media platform. - by sharing your public key wi
18.
by ZetsuBouKyo 2y ago
The US Department of Justice has a proposal that Google sell off Chrome to prevent a monopoly. This might be a great approach to solve the problem.