Zetice

5 ms·

1.
by Zetice 3y ago
Eh, you got the other guy so this was worth. See you in a few months. Worth considering why I'm consistently able to gather top 5% of points per day though, if I'm so objectionable.
2.
by Zetice 3y ago
They have not, this is false.
3.
by Zetice 3y ago
All of which I consent to and benefit from? You don’t understand what ownership or citizenship means, clearly. Yes, you are done.
4.
by Zetice 3y ago
The house analogy makes zero sense, as my house is not a commons (I am sole owner, even with a mortgage, methinks you don’t have one of these), but if it were then yes, anyone agreeing to the social contract of the government of my home w
5.
by Zetice 3y ago
Huh? My home isn’t a commons and requires no management of a shared resource. You need a bureaucracy once you have a shared resource, and at that point no one is entitled to the resource more than anyone else.
6.
by Zetice 3y ago
As a drunk, we for sure care.
7.
by Zetice 3y ago
When you aren’t the sole owner of the resources being managed. Once you establish a commons, you need a bureaucracy of some kind to manage it.
8.
by Zetice 3y ago
What makes you think I’m not also terminally online? Heh
9.
by Zetice 3y ago
They are not bound by law not to make those requests, they are bound by policy.
10.
by Zetice 3y ago
What does any of this have to do with what I said? Regardless of how much a doctor can help you or not, if you’re shitting uncontrollably in the streets, you need to seek medical attention to determine if they can do anything about it.
11.
by Zetice 3y ago
There aren’t actually tags on HN, just fyi, but if there were it’d be a backtick.
12.
by Zetice 3y ago
And you think pestering someone like this is a winner?
13.
by Zetice 3y ago
I don’t think they care…
14.
by Zetice 3y ago
Not sure what you expect to happen here…
15.
by Zetice 3y ago
If my house were like a country, it would be quite convenient and I would indeed open my home to everyone willing to participate in my social contract. But my home isn’t in any way like a country, so this question isn’t meaningful.
16.
by Zetice 3y ago
Like I said before, none of this matters to the core point; regardless of SFs lack of public restrooms, no healthy person is shitting in the street.
17.
by Zetice 3y ago
…are you alright dude?
18.
by Zetice 3y ago
Why did you spam this all over the thread?
19.
by Zetice 3y ago
I don’t think saying you need to talk to a doctor is flamebaiting…
20.
by Zetice 3y ago
Not that it matters, but I gained ~60 votes from repeatedly telling you to seek medical advice for your uncontrollable bowels.
21.
by Zetice 3y ago
? Did you double post this?
22.
by Zetice 3y ago
None of this changes the basic fact that you need medical attention if you are shitting uncontrollably in the street.
23.
by Zetice 3y ago
I’m not a doctor, but you should see one if you’re shitting in the street.
24.
by Zetice 3y ago
Society would not even come close to collapsing, that is unrealistic.
25.
by Zetice 3y ago
Good lord based on this guy I am now worried…
26.
by Zetice 3y ago
Lmao yes, my uninformed medical opinion does say that.
27.
by Zetice 3y ago
Nope, you said you shat yourself in the streets of SF and I told you to seek medical attention, and you could not handle it. That’s it.
28.
by Zetice 3y ago
Nothing should result in a healthy person being unable to control their bowels to the point of shitting in the streets.
29.
by Zetice 3y ago
Telling someone to see a doctor isn’t medical advice. Telling someone not to shit in the street is also not medical advice; it’s basic human decency.
30.
by Zetice 3y ago
I don’t shit in the street on my way there.

More ›