Yopolo

5 ms·

1.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
No clue why you have to respond like this. Feel free to be a dick to someone else.
2.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
We have the same issue and now spending more time/energy on optimizing the code review agent. This might lead to more automatisation and not less if it works. After all we might extract everything critical to us. We also now expect jun
3.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
No clue? I don't think they are totally usesless. And its clear that progression is happening on a communith level on all of these and they get integrated later on in commercial offerings like from Anthropic and co. But also doing a op
4.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
Thats just not true and we see this in medicine and research. An expert in physics still needs to write code in python to do their math and analysis. Its an intelligence issue. That person needs to learn a tool. In medicin you have the mode
5.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
It learned a concept of a heuristic which made it smart enough for the learning reward. Might be an architecture issue or a parameter size issue that it didn't learn to do math like a caculator. But look at your own math skills: How ma
6.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
I'm curious if LLM could easily be manipulated to actually process data in context and remove it from its context and replace it with the result or a hint. Might break the caching, perhaps this can be solved with snapshot ids or cache
7.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
> Please elaborate. How? With which technique? Reinforcement learning can just solve things even if they are new. It doesn't understand how a tool works? Give it a vm with the tool, a thousand agents and let it discover it automatic
8.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
Yes this is unfortunate and not what I meant. I mean the token prices in general as certain services were never really using a subscription. I do run a claude subscripton right now though and since there capacity change, i hit the limit rar
9.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
We just put different things together and then we evaluate it. In math its simple: does the verification say its okay. If its mechanical: is any property better than what we have already. etc.
10.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
> So you mean AI will be useful for any general job without lots of training for those jobs? How about new tasks? I'm pretty sure we will solve this issue. Either already through World Models or another architecture. It could also b
11.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
I'm waiting for the agentic ai platform layer. We see AI factories going in this direction but there is no real 'the open source ai platform' thingy. It needs connectors to integrate with k8s, hyperscalers etc. it needs to be
12.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
And without an LLM you wouldn't even try? I don't mind semi-deterministic for plenty of things. But these agents like hermes, can codify a skill to be deterministic.
13.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
> shifting the work elsewhere for specialized tasks. More replicable, improved, but, it scales infinitely and is autonomous? Can you assert that? I would say yes and it will scale. It will either happen through central LLM just paying fo
14.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
"become more linear starting in Q4" We are not even close to what AI slowdown looks like. The whole business side of things are now building Agentic Layer for Business applications. All of this Agentic Layer needs to be build and
15.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
Then yeah you might not be a good developer. LLMs are also quite good in writing unit tests and understanding bugs a lot faster than I do, now. Just a few month back i looked at some yaml stuff for like 20 minutes, played around with it, lo
16.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
I for sure do plenty of things with AI a lot faster. Instead of searching some linux issue, i will prompt claude to generate a small analyser script for checking wha tlinux i have, i will tell it what hardware i have and it fixed my issue i
17.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
We switched from looking at an UI (claude webui) and waiting for code generation to using claude exclusivlie on the cli and claude doing a lot more stuff in the background with smaller prompts. For me it changes in a way that i would like t
18.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
In my company GitHub CoPilot was rolled out on a global scale last year. LLMs from Anthropic and co we get through a central tool which buys api tokens from Azure and AWS. Its surprisingly fast, probably thefastest i have seen technology ge
19.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
LLM don't work on 'compressed data'. LLM compress data into their latent space which allows them to become general. They learn the concept of things and how to do them because this is better compression than learning concepts
20.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
It still makes a massive difference for me if they only need a handfull people now. Generating a good looking UI for example, is so much easier now with LLM. For a joke I asked ChatGPT yesterday to make a short promoimage for a 'joke&#
21.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
No we don't know your 'points' The Hallucinations are becoming less, significantly by now. It also might be already were it is cheaper for one of the big few companies to spend millions and billions to teach the LLM / cr
22.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
Java as a programming language doesn't enforce any architecture. There is no difference to go. Its a system of folders. The tests need to be green, the math needs to math, but the code can look a little bit different here or there. I d
23.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
Besides that i still think its wayy to early to put AI in front of center of everything, the current progress at least makes it clear that is not going to stay as it is. Noneetheless, if the blog article already determines a gain of 15% and
24.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
AI doesn't need to be deterministic.
25.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
Start extracting specs from the codebase. Prompt the core architecutre well suited for it. Let it write tests. Let it vibe migrate from left to write. Now you at least have a chance of a team being able to work on that code base and actuall
26.
by Yopolo 1mo ago
Aehm we were writing proper math code in Java 15 years ago already. Your 0.1 + 0.2 example wasn't an issue than and is not an issue today.
27.
by Yopolo 2mo ago
I'm happy that AI hasn't taken over yet but I do not know how the future for studens will look like and I don't know how we will continue training humans.
28.
by Yopolo 2mo ago
Every single new working student we get, we have to teach every single thing again. Its a massive effort for our team it has to be a massive effort around the globe if you take quality series. It will just be easier better cheaper to teach
29.
by Yopolo 2mo ago
Thats an assumption you made up. Your 'experience' is probably an emerging feature of your complexity and not the reason for some qualia.
30.
by Yopolo 2mo ago
The mechanical clock or a von-neumann based computer were never as similiar as neural networks. We can find similiar structures in brain and in neural networks. The real question is only if the complexity of the structure of the brain is cr

More ›