Ydarbleoj

5 ms·

1.
by Ydarbleoj 4d ago
I get it. I do. I just believe we live in a world where our corporate leaders speak out of both sides of their mouths. And typically, people who get to these positions are not the Jacob Coxon's of the world. That is to say, I've b
2.
by Ydarbleoj 4d ago
Because I find the cognitive dissonance of saying it's dangerous while flying as fast as possible to an IPO too much to take. I just don't understand how others parse this differently.
3.
by Ydarbleoj 4d ago
The more he talks the less seriously I take him.
4.
by Ydarbleoj 4d ago
He talks too much and as a result it's looked like pre-IPO hype and disingenuous because if he believed what he says then he'd stop. Now, someone is going to say but the investors and obligation to be first; and I would say exactl
5.
by Ydarbleoj 5d ago
Totally, but I didn't say political means everything I said everything is political, which means anything a human does to any extent, tacitly or otherwise, is embedded in a power structure.
6.
by Ydarbleoj 5d ago
What you're suggesting is that it's a spectrum and I agree. I don't know what to tell you.
7.
by Ydarbleoj 5d ago
Just to be clear, everything is political - whether you want to acknowledge it or not.
8.
by Ydarbleoj 5d ago
Whoa. That's not at all what they said and shows you lack intellectual honesty.
9.
by Ydarbleoj 6d ago
Sounds less stressful.
10.
by Ydarbleoj 6d ago
That's what a lot of American companies say. Wait until you hear about Amazon's practices.
11.
by Ydarbleoj 6d ago
The one that requires full-attention from the driver? No.
12.
by Ydarbleoj 6d ago
Sorry, but the notion that creative writing and robotaxi's exist as proof of anything is like saying my child can drive and write; and while true, the measure of that ability is not at the level of the best humans. It's average at
13.
by Ydarbleoj 6d ago
Delivers an ungodly amount of space pollution that's for sure.
14.
by Ydarbleoj 7d ago
It’s not about what they say but what they do and right now no frontier AI company deserves anything but skepticism based on how they act verse what they say.
15.
by Ydarbleoj 7d ago
This is a reminder based on believing what these companies say. I’ve lived long enough to know what they say and what they do are often quite different; and it is not our job to trust but to verify.
16.
by Ydarbleoj 8d ago
Yes.
17.
by Ydarbleoj 8d ago
We should absolutely be able to see inside of our prisons. What are they hiding (My expectation is that we treat people humanely. You can tell a lot about a society by how they treat their prisoners)?
18.
by Ydarbleoj 8d ago
I think this is a good point. My only push back would be that when people say they have ADHD, in my experience, they're speaking about inattention (and yes, it's one of the big factors). And while I don't love that aspect in
19.
by Ydarbleoj 8d ago
> At 11:58 P.M. EDT on Monday, Buckmaster posted his and Alpöge’s results, along with the statement laying out his account of events. According to the statement, he does not know how the OpenAI team so quickly reconstructed the details o
20.
by Ydarbleoj 13d ago
I don't get this take. I feel like this area is feeling much of what we're seeing in many major cities (SF being the most expensive in the country); locals priced out of starting store front businesses due to high commercial rents
21.
by Ydarbleoj 29d ago
But that value is subjective. If my tap water is brown as a result of a DC, I may not agree with your positives. If my neighborhood is humming all night because of a DC, again, I might not have the ability to see what you see as positive. S
22.
by Ydarbleoj 29d ago
Let's say a DC is being built in my area and I read how in some locations tap water is being polluted by these DCs. Wouldn't it be better to address that before it's built rather than after?
23.
by Ydarbleoj 29d ago
These comments are full of the "but you participate in society" fallacy. Data centers can do a thing positively and yet have negative impacts that should be discussed. It's not that hard.
24.
by Ydarbleoj 29d ago
You are engaging in the "but you participate in society" fallacy. One can critique systems they are still interacting with, to suggest otherwise is just so incredibly lazy.
25.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
Assault is doing some heavy lifting here for the sensitive crowd.
26.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
So if someone critiques LE they’re leftist? That’s pretty lazy and definitely indicative of someone in a silo.
27.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
Needham is great and his Visual Differential Geometry and Forms is excellent.
28.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
I still think it's more about the cost of compute than security.
29.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
Then feel free to lobby for a data center in your community; and then let me know how your tap water is.
30.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
My son does this. Points out all the issues in the world that I didn't address when I point something he's done. It's a childlike response insisting that either we talk about everything or nothing. Weird take. > That could

More ›