Yakimoto

5 ms·

1.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
Continue to trivialize it more by using it to beat everyone around [including randoms on the internet] with your smugness.
2.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
This is a "tool" lol.
3.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
Has it ever occurred to you that you have a ton of control over your general health and can protect yourself from physical injury extremely well? Has it ever occurred to you that many people in the United State don't have legs?
4.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
Sounds like buyers remorse, not that you were swindled. You wanted "access to a wider range of consumer goods and services" you got that access. Now that you want to save money instead means that you just changed your mind... agai
5.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
in 2012 we had this in Afghanistan on almost every single container/pallet/load.
6.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
I hope you apply the same logic to the homeless that move into your local parks and community areas. They are just trying to seek economic advantage, wealthy people have more money to give. It normal to strive for maximum return on minimal
7.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
>Upper class white people Your racism is showing. Upper class people like Cocaine too, care to inject a racial undertone as to why that is illegal?
8.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
Long winded article and it doesn't even answer the question. Rent in NYC is high because people are paying it. Your pay is low because you decided it is. Lots of CEOs think their pay is low too as they drive a new Lexus off the dealers
9.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
Having a newborn isn't a task put against you. You elected for it. Don't perpetuate the idea that some credit is owed to parents as if it's not a year long vacation.
10.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
Another important factor to consider; I am small troll A suing company B. I lose, judge orders that troll A pay all the legal fees. I don't have the money, I file bankruptcy, I flee the country. Lawyers still want to get paid. I doubt
11.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
I agree with him.
12.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
It's hardly noteworthy to move that much a day.
13.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
>do we actually try and fix the fundamental problem? >I can't be the only one >We need to deal with wealth inequality. Shill harder.
14.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
>employer has already refused to invest in you, no? Obviously you are omitting the myriad of cases that an employer would like to invest in you but can't (yet) from your statement. Plenty of things like a lack of funding, individual
15.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
Sad to see that its voted down so aggressively, because it's true. Many individuals assume it's their privilege to be employed by you.
16.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
It's still amazing how much we determine maturity by numerical age and not maturity or experience. Point being, pretending to be off put by a reasonable and logical thing doesn't make you correct.
17.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
The logic is a mess here. A) Nobody is mad that a mail boy makes $75k. They are mad that they carry more of a workload than a mail boy but are rewarded with identical compensation. B) It bolsters stagnation. $75k is great pay for mail room
18.
by Yakimoto 11y ago
I'm in love /w this post! Not only is it informative but it clearly expresses the differences between decision making in real-world scenarios and delving deep into the data for an 'on-paper' optimal decision.
19.
by Yakimoto 12y ago
Amen! A free thinker, not a party line parrot.
20.
by Yakimoto 12y ago
Maybe you should consider adjusting your understanding of poor too.
21.
by Yakimoto 12y ago
>less economically privileged. wow
22.
by Yakimoto 12y ago
Holy crap, I haven't been there in awhile. It's almost torture to see such trash on the front page. Soon I will go there to get my TMZ updates about the hollywood stars or rappers who did something, maybe, possibly tangentially re
23.
by Yakimoto 12y ago
Your posts are fairly thematic in the sense that you are always willing to do less or need more resources to accomplish the task. More manpower, more money/pay or more time off isn't the definitive answer to problems. At the end o