Xudong

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Xudong 2y ago

   Fact-checking is really hard. How do you know what sources are reliable? How to balance or compare contradict evidences? We don’t have a clear answer yet. Therefore, instead of making the decision simply based on AI, we assist users with an
2. 2.▲
   by Xudong 2y ago

   This past week has been transformative since Loki went open source. We're thrilled by the progress and eager to share our development plan. Thanks to your input, we have enhanced the tool's flexibility and optimized its installati
3. 3.▲
   by Xudong 2y ago

   I will take it as a compliment, lol. But I do hope ChatGPT or some agents could help me with this. Btw, our recent study on machine-generated text detection might be interesting to you. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14902
4. 4.▲
   by Xudong 2y ago

   Thanks for your feedback on the gif figure, swores! We will revise it soon.
5. 5.▲
   by Xudong 2y ago

   Hi siffland! Thank you for your feedback. We understand your concern about the potential confusion given the popularity of Grafana Loki in the logging space. When naming our project, we sought a name that encapsulates our goal of combating
6. 6.▲
   by Xudong 2y ago

   Thank you for your suggestions, axegon!!! We will definitely consider them and add the features in a future version shortly. Regarding the first version, we are currently working on enabling customized evidence retrieval, including local fi
7. 7.▲
   by Xudong 2y ago

   Hello vinni2, thank you for mentioning the paper. However, I noticed that it hasn't gone through peer review yet. Also, the paper suggests that fine-tuning may work better than in-context learning, but that's not a problem. You ca
8. 8.▲
   by Xudong 2y ago

   I apologize for any confusion caused earlier. The core components have been defined separately ( https://github.com/Libr-AI/OpenFactVerification/tree/main/fa... ) to make customization easier. We understan
9. 9.▲
   by Xudong 2y ago

   ahah thanks!
10. 10.▲
    by Xudong 2y ago

    I wholeheartedly agree on the necessity of linking fact-checking tools to credible sources. Currently, our team's expertise lies primarily in AI, and we find ourselves at a disadvantage when it comes to pinpointing authoritative source
11. 11.▲
    by Xudong 2y ago

    Yes, they are similar. Actually, our initial paper was presented around five months ago ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09000 ). Unfortunately, our paper isn't cited by the DeepMind paper, which you may see this discus
12. 12.▲
    by Xudong 2y ago

    Hi there, I agree that fact-checking is not something that current generative AI models can directly solve. Therefore, we decompose this complex into five simpler steps, which current techniques can better solve. Please refer to https:&#x2
13. 13.▲
    by Xudong 2y ago

    Hi Der_Einzige, thanks for pointing out these two great datasets! We are currently working on including customized evidence sources internally and will definitely consider these two datasets in the future version of this open-source project
14. 14.▲
    by Xudong 2y ago

    Thanks for your response. When discussing fact-checking capabilities, the key question is always: Can we guarantee that it will always offer the correct justification? While it's unfortunate, errors can occur. Nonetheless, we prioritiz
15. 15.▲
    Loki: An open-source tool for fact verification(github.com)

    238 points by Xudong 2y ago|68 comments