Xelbair

6 ms·

1.
by Xelbair 6d ago
The issue is that it is a procgen game, with separate systems that rarely interact with each other and you never get an actual emergent gameplay. No matter the biome, no matter the planet you just tick check-boxes which systems are enabled
2.
by Xelbair 7d ago
Real answer was always no. Tailwind is just conceptually bunch of css inline styles repackaged as classes for performance boost. It was always just shifting complexity around, but offered an immediate perception of productivity gain, becaus
3.
by Xelbair 17d ago
Or maybe it's impossible to satisfy desires of such culturally diverse populace as EU citizens. Which makes current model, and federated model impossible and/or prone to crumbling. Problems of Germany are different than one Spain
4.
by Xelbair 17d ago
EU and EC have been made as a resistant to populism by design, the end result is that we citizens can't change anything, and decisions are arbitrarily made behind closed doors. The amount of layers between your vote, and the elected of
5.
by Xelbair 17d ago
because it is a perfect tool for all governments to 'wash' unpopular political bills that would be a political suicide in local politics. You're asking the group profiting from current arrangement to change it.
6.
by Xelbair 20d ago
and at least few of them are extremely similar culturally
7.
by Xelbair 20d ago
I don't see federalism ever working - you have thousand of years of grudges within EU that you would have to overcome, plus gigantic cultural differences that lead to completely different ways of life. Trade union is more likely honest
8.
by Xelbair 20d ago
Late response as i rarely check HN replies. European Commission is so disjoined from electorate through many layers of elections, that it can disregard it completely - practically citizens have no input on EC's body. Any legislation or
9.
by Xelbair 23d ago
Including EC, and MEP themselves.
10.
by Xelbair 23d ago
>One of the biggest problems that I have in the EU is that it's almost federated I would argue it's even worse, because with properly designed federated system you get checks and balances to some extent. There are parts of EU t
11.
by Xelbair 1mo ago
Simple - you need to assign blame, and you need to do it in a fair way. Any assingement of blame of using unauthorized LLM generated content could be shifted to external contractor(preferably outside of EU's jurisdiction) where you you
12.
by Xelbair 1mo ago
it's not about having 98% confidence. but 100% irrefutable proof. You can go to reddit and cherry pick coments, that are made before LLMs, that have that exact LLM style.
13.
by Xelbair 2mo ago
Isn't the whole problem that it is impossible to determine if content is AI or not? Doesn't this make it impossible to prove under 'innocent untill proven guilty' unless you're really blatant about it? And isn'
14.
by Xelbair 2mo ago
>The options-space for doing this appears to be: (0) give up ... (n) waste resources yeah, i think current state is good enough, might as well slap regulation and ban any form of targetted ads.
15.
by Xelbair 2mo ago
In reality, the ones making such check will want extra capabilities 'just in case' as we observe now, or just go for simpler solution because it's cheaper. How does it prevent fingerprinting if you get access to both logs and
16.
by Xelbair 2mo ago
>It’s also pretty obvious that saying “parent should take responsibility” is also not working. Just observe the world around you to know it’s a non starter. Then who should? Government, where each implementation strips away rights to pri
17.
by Xelbair 2mo ago
Which would be fine, if it was just a trade union like originally designed. I really love the original idea of EU. I could even get behind more federation style, although trade union is vastly preferable for me - but I do understand people
18.
by Xelbair 3mo ago
the problem is that EU has no way for citizens/voters to actually purge those bad individuals.
19.
by Xelbair 3mo ago
which speaks volumes about either EU overstepping it's bounds as an entity, or is severely lacking checks and balances.
20.
by Xelbair 3mo ago
>Lets say the primary force we need to prevent is russian influence campaigns that back and push far right nationalists who will destabilize democracy. Is that a sufficient reason for controls? No. Because if you solve underlying tension
21.
by Xelbair 3mo ago
>both sides
22.
by Xelbair 4mo ago
>It doesn't answer the question of "what do we do about parents that don't do their job properly." Like with normal cases - have court go over this. But decision if any form of age lock should be implemented or not is
23.
by Xelbair 4mo ago
>They've essentially gotten roped into maintaining a huge chunk of internet infrastructure, for free Just because they don't charge you directly, doesn’t matter it's not profitable for them.
24.
by Xelbair 5mo ago
or cyclists should have their own lanes, pedestrians shouldn't walk on them - and vice versa. and if you're stuck behind someone slow just overtake them when you can. Safe or not - it is up to individual to decide if it is worth t
25.
by Xelbair 5mo ago
I hate this approach to them problem, because it is not a technical problem. Because it focuses on technical aspects and accepts the premise of 'age verification must be solved'. It doesn’t, and discretion what content and and wha
26.
by Xelbair 6mo ago
the issue isn't fines themselves it's the fact that fines are part of agency's income and it is their best interest(as a bureaucratic agency) to keep them at highest level where companies will still pay them. Effectively this
27.
by Xelbair 6mo ago
Why? why would we need to fund and make Europen Alternative to Surveilance (tm) when we could just you know - not have it at all?
28.
by Xelbair 6mo ago
they wouldn't wait an hour either.
29.
by Xelbair 6mo ago
>Right, I would argue they are part of technology, because bureaucracy clearly is, laws move in scope of what's possible and economically feasible, and culture is entirely downstream of that. then you’re using different definition t
30.
by Xelbair 6mo ago
ever heard of things like laws? like culture? like changing procedures instead of means? unless you want to argue semantics and go 'actually they're all part of technology', but that makes your argument even less meaningful.

More ›