Xeamek

10 ms·

1.
by Xeamek 3mo ago
if baby is 100% US citizen then how is that an 'illegal immigrant'? Again, you may call them 'unwanted', and you have right to such opinion. But law is what is written, if they got citizenship then they aren't illeg
2.
by Xeamek 3mo ago
People who abuse birthright citizenships are, by definitions, not illegal immigrants. But even if you count all of them as 'unwanted' immigrants - how many % of total immigration to the US is result of those birthright laws?
3.
by Xeamek 6mo ago
probably to highlight how this isn't genuine account?
4.
by Xeamek 1y ago
core (as in kernel) is running linux kernel which is C, yes. But java is not 'just UI' - majority of user space apps run java (or jvm, to be precise), as well as tons of system services, to the point where you can't actually
5.
by Xeamek 1y ago
Not to mention him saying no one writes java anymore when it literally powers world's most popular OS (android) and double digit percentage of internet backends
6.
by Xeamek 2y ago
What if the enemy won't allow for your surrender and just want to kill you regardless?
7.
by Xeamek 2y ago
What's the point of hypethotical then?
8.
by Xeamek 2y ago
So just borders? In the end, it’s the people who fight that determine if the thing they are fighting for is worth their lives. Dying for some lines on the map sounds bad, but if it were only lines on the map, then the people probably wouldn
9.
by Xeamek 2y ago
Depends on specific boundaries, but literally all of human history is about fighting for people's rights to hold one boundary or another
10.
by Xeamek 2y ago
Who led the coup in "your" country?
11.
by Xeamek 2y ago
You know what hypothetical question is?
12.
by Xeamek 2y ago
Really? Even if that would result with your new living conditions to be literally North Korea style or the worst of islamic terrorist state?
13.
by Xeamek 2y ago
So when your country will be attacked you will give up your lands and your freedoms just for sake of "less people dying"?
14.
by Xeamek 2y ago
Post specific or shut up, because this is just spewing bullshit with some true bits sprinkled on top for the sake of deniability.
15.
by Xeamek 2y ago
>But in the end he didn't end Democracy, he let the democratic procedures take place, a fascist wouldn't do that. Fascist wouldn't fail? Again, You know Hitler literally tried a coup, failed and then switched to 'demo
16.
by Xeamek 2y ago
"X is a fascist" is not just a simple insult. Pretending that's all it is is ignorance at best
17.
by Xeamek 2y ago
You know that Hitler was literally voted into power, right? I am NOT saying Trump is literally Hitler, but the idea that democratic vote can't have un-democratic outcome in the long run is simply false. It can, and history showed us th
18.
by Xeamek 2y ago
Ok, well... that's not really an argument, is it? It actually is, though. Sure, it didn’t work—probably because enough people weren’t convinced that it was true enough (and also because they didn’t care)—but it's not unreasonable
19.
by Xeamek 2y ago
But the world generation is already deterministic with seeds
20.
by Xeamek 2y ago
Please don't. I personally found the idea inspiring and the article itself is explaining it succinctly. Even if it's not completely revolutionary, it's small, self containing concept that's actionable. Lowley surprised w
21.
by Xeamek 2y ago
>They need to ve rebuilt with our "library" Doesn't termux already require all its packages to be compiled against android NDKs?
22.
by Xeamek 2y ago
"There exists in such a case a certain institution or law; let us say, for the sake of simplicity, a fence or gate erected across a road. The more modern type of reformer goes gaily up to it and says, “I don’t see the use of this; let
23.
by Xeamek 2y ago
Does any of it really matter if Your phone still is running GoogleMobileServices deeply integrated with the OS itself?
24.
by Xeamek 2y ago
No she can't, comments likes yours are just made up nonsense that AI hype-mans and investors somehow convinced us are a fair opinions to have.
25.
by Xeamek 2y ago
At the end of the day, as long as there is player input, cheaters always can simulate it/enchance it. But the deeper your anticheat detection, the higher friction there is for cheater. Having to get extra hardware/modify existing
26.
by Xeamek 2y ago
You can render all the scenarios in the world, but ultimately You have to tell the client which on is correct. And this will always be simply too slow for fast paced games. Unless ofcourse you send the confirmation to frames before its ac
27.
by Xeamek 2y ago
Disagree. But it's not really feasible to argue since you need to be on such high level in the first place to honestly engage in 'is this player chesting' conversation. And it's on case-by-case basis
28.
by Xeamek 2y ago
You absolutely can do that and (almost) all games do that already. This type of cheats are DECADES in the past. Today is all about a) enhancing normal behavior with artificial precision, not making any 'illegal' (from game perspe
29.
by Xeamek 2y ago
'Promotions' table is incorrect, right? It's inverted...
30.
by Xeamek 2y ago
Because languages are more then just syntax, so ofcourse You'd rather have your favorite language copy some syntax you like, then be forced to switch entire stack to another language just to be able to use that syntax

More ›