X-Ryl669

5 ms·

1.
by X-Ryl669 16d ago
It speaks Germany perfectly. And even English sometimes.
2.
by X-Ryl669 2mo ago
Because it's missing (interesting) content maybe? Content is a bandwidth issue. If you need so much bandwidth for a flat, planar 4k stream, how many more do you need for a 100 planes (still pretty flat IMHO) for depth ? Or 1000 planes
3.
by X-Ryl669 3mo ago
I'm not 100% sure it's not possible. If (I don't know) it's possible to freeze the temperature of the model so it's deterministic, and if you could make a map of produced words back to tokens (via HMM probably), the
4.
by X-Ryl669 3mo ago
No it doesn't. Think of the intro of We'll rock you and show me how you perform that on your piano.
5.
by X-Ryl669 6mo ago
That's true. And, in my understanding, what OO did, falls exactly in paragraph b and d. The license doesn't describe what is the "Appropriate Legal Notices" and OO provided a description for it: its logo and its trademar
6.
by X-Ryl669 6mo ago
The license contains (section 7): > [you may] supplement the terms of this License with terms: > >[...] > > b) Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or > author attributions in that material or
7.
by X-Ryl669 6mo ago
This is bullshit. Read section 7 paragraph b of the AGPLv3 license, and you'll see that OnlyOffice did what they were allowed to do. The Nextcloud blog here is spreading FUD on their partner which will likely cause more damage to them
8.
by X-Ryl669 6mo ago
I think you're claiming wrong stuff here. AGPLv3 section 7 paragraph b) expressively authorize the author to require an attribution in the derived work or copy. What Nextcloud did was to remove this attribution, so they actually mooted
9.
by X-Ryl669 6mo ago
I think you're confused by the term "permissions". You can give more freedom to the license and a copier can remove them as long as it doesn't remove the freedom that are in AGPLv3. The OnlyOffice team claim comes from t
10.
by X-Ryl669 6mo ago
Since there's a single provider of this "specification", which is more or less Google, why even bother calling it a standard? Even more that Google's implementation is not following the published standard, breaking poten
11.
by X-Ryl669 8mo ago
No you can't. dlopen signature takes a file path, not a memory range. And if you start to save the libraries to the filesystem before opening them, there's no difference to shipping an archive directly and skip the trouble of your
12.
by X-Ryl669 8mo ago
Read that: https://blog.cyril.by/fr/software/an-expressive-text-to-spee... and you'll find answers to your remarks
13.
by X-Ryl669 10mo ago
I don't get why you process the whole connector board at once. If I understand correctly, you're connecting individual & identic boards to your board. So each connector on you giant board is actually dealing a bunch of small b
14.
by X-Ryl669 11mo ago
No you can't since the compiler will likely inline the syscall (or vsyscall) in your functions. So there's no way to know the instruction pointer is in the right section. The only way is to pay for no-inline cost and have a wrappe
15.
by X-Ryl669 1y ago
I'm using https://glaxnimate.org/ . It's not well known but it's stable and works well for all my needs.
16.
by X-Ryl669 1y ago
FreeCAD files are zip file containing XML documents. There's nothing binary in them, you can modify them by hand if you want. The main issue being that the format itself isn't standardized, so it's continuously evolving, it c