Wyverald

8 ms·

1.
by Wyverald 16d ago
The article says this: > von Zweigbergk will continue to be a core maintainer of JJ as an open source project under the Apache 2.0 license.
2.
by Wyverald 5mo ago
God forbid an article presents all the evidence from all parties and asks you to reach a conclusion by yourself... Sorry for the snark. But I genuinely think the way they did this was perfect.
3.
by Wyverald 5mo ago
In American English, "insure" can also mean "to make sure" as in "ensure", in additional to meaning "to take out insurance for".
4.
by Wyverald 6mo ago
In case you haven't seen this: https://x.com/JeffDean/status/2024525132266688757
5.
by Wyverald 6mo ago
Just noting that the phrasing "readily available alternatives" by itself is slightly ambiguous: it could be read as subsetting ("the alternatives that are readily available") or just attributive ("the alternatives,
6.
by Wyverald 7mo ago
For the record, almost the exact same expression exists in English: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_throw_the_baby_out_wit...
7.
by Wyverald 8mo ago
>> I also am wearing machine-fabricated clothing and enjoying a host of other products of automation. > I'm not really a fan of the "you criticize society yet you participate in it" argument. It seems to me that GP i
8.
by Wyverald 8mo ago
Why put it above the _keyboard_, though? what you described sounds just like the macOS menu bar, but perhaps a bit more customizable. Why not just do that (make the menu bar more customizable)? As a user of the touch bar, I _hated_ having t
9.
by Wyverald 8mo ago
That was a sensible chuckle indeed... but then it also made me realize that grabbing things IRL _moves_ them, not _resizes_ them. Nothing IRL really resizes. So while it makes a lot of sense to grab inside the object to move it, IMO it actu
10.
by Wyverald 8mo ago
Very much agree. Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. Not saying GP's opinion was pure nostalgia, but a lot of people certainly selectively remember only the good parts as they complain about the now.
11.
by Wyverald 8mo ago
Curious why you liked it so much. Removing the fn keys was a big no-no, yes, but also it was just located in a place I'm never going to look at. So why do you think it would've been a hit feature?
12.
by Wyverald 8mo ago
FWIW, this is the least effective way to disagree with someone on the internet. Everyone knows it, even yourself. (snark aside -- either say _why_ you disagree, or just don't engage at all if you think it's a troll.)
13.
by Wyverald 8mo ago
how ever did you reach that conclusion? For 1, his tweet literally says "That, of course, is DISGUSTING and even before yesterday’s fine we had multiple legal challenges pending against the underlying scheme." 2 is something that
14.
by Wyverald 9mo ago
Gemini 3 Pro gave some rather unimpressive answers: https://gemini.google.com/share/3cbcbe1fd64c
15.
by Wyverald 9mo ago
I'm a total noob here, but just pointing out that Omniscience Index is roughly "Accuracy - Hallucination Rate". So it simply means that their Accuracy was very high. > In the Hallucination Rate vs. AA-Omniscience Index cha
16.
by Wyverald 10mo ago
thanks for the update. One small note: for the d20 test, NB Pro had duplications of 13 and 17 too, not just 19.
17.
by Wyverald 10mo ago
thanks, I love your website. Are you planning to do NB Pro for the text-to-image benchmark too?
18.
by Wyverald 2y ago
> It currently features 36 fantastic films and also White Noise (2022). _oof_
19.
by Wyverald 2y ago
I love the new UI. Reduces a lot of visual clutter and lets me focus on the code. I don't understand the problem with telling where a tab ends and the next begins; I don't click on the borders of tabs anyway, just the text. (And t
20.
by Wyverald 9y ago
> т is a homoglyph of T—because one could mistake one for the other. I believe gp is talking about the font. In some fonts (especially italic/cursive), the letter "т" looks like "m", and nothing like "T&quot
21.
by Wyverald 10y ago
I'm sure you understand that not all language features fall under Turing-completeness.
22.
by Wyverald 10y ago
Alternatively, when a protocol "moz://" does pop up, they can just register the domain 'a'.
23.
by Wyverald 10y ago
> It's because it's designed to be used in Directions mode with location services enabled, and only in Directions mode with location services enabled. If you don't provide a source for this, I'm going to call bullshit
24.
by Wyverald 10y ago
One reason: Google needs this info in order to give it to you. Sure, you can acquire this info via some other means, but that would mean someone else having it.
25.
by Wyverald 10y ago
I think you missed his, though -- which was that any person with a high-school math background can easily grasp the concept of monoids with just a tiny bit of effort.
26.
by Wyverald 10y ago
re your first point, the author did point out that this would pollute the namespace with names like hex, integer, etc.