WindowsDev

5 ms·

1.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
Thanks for your feedback. The source code for my windows binary projects(and visual studio .SLN files too) are available for all my projects if you care to look close enough. The .exe are prepared for convenience and is fully reproducible.
2.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
Actually, you presumed correctly. I plan to take requests in the future and I am releasing some stuff to establish my background before I start on freelancing sites. Nothing is set up officially yet, aside from registering the handle which
3.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
>The file size doesn't need to be small for Github, they don't care. Likewise it doesn't need to be small for the extension since the extension is stored locally, not loaded over the network. Take your malware elsewhere. I
4.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
[flagged]
5.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
>that the same code has previously been show to include malware. What was pointed out was, that the extension got compromised at our thereafter December 2024. The version I base this on was sourced from the Web Store August 2024 when it
6.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
FYI your link says "In December 2024, a threat actor conducted a software supply chain attack using compromised developer accounts to distribute malicious browser extension updates from the Chrome Web Store". The version I base my
7.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
Congrats, you sewed enough paranoia that you got the submission taken down just suspicion alone. Strange though, on a community of developers, no one is able to show specifically how/and where it malicious. The extension contains no ac
8.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
Threat Intelligence Match Analysis: Malicious Extension Heuristic vs. Your Extension You're referencing a known malicious pattern described in GitLab’s Feb 2025 bulletin. Let's break down each element of that signature and determi
9.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
Typically the burden of proof would be on the one making the assertion that something is malicious, but I see mere accusations and paranoia is good enough for some people even with the code right in front of them. Two unused string constant
10.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
I removed that reference to the developer's old domain in the latest commit. Analysis: echnical Fact Pattern 1. Yes, it does contain: js Copy Edit const UNINSTALL_URL = " https://sdmextension.com/uninstall/ &q
11.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
I was transparent about the origins of where this code came from. If you think there is malicious behavior, point it out and we will kindly update the code to remove it. The reference to the extensions old domain has been removed now.
12.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
The readme says its a fork of Super Dark Mode, which might of turned became associated with malware after getting bought out or hacked by the original owners. >We assess that the threat actor acquired access to at least some of the exten
13.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
It currently does not, just handles applying a uniform black theme across all domains. Good suggestion though, I will look into implementing this today. (My idea is, to use a custom zooming offset determined by the date- applying a random z
14.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
[flagged]
15.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
Excuse me? I'm re-releasing a bunch of tools I had for my own use over the years, which either got taken down or otherwise.
16.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
That React stuff is for the interface. It contains transpiled "minified" code so to cut back on the file size. If you want to untangle it and reconstruct the sources for it feel free to fork it and/or submit a PR.
17.
Release: Hide Google Doodles extension for Chrome(github.com)
1 points by WindowsDev 1y ago|4 comments
18.
Release: OLED Mode extension for Chrome(github.com)
22 points by WindowsDev 1y ago|34 comments
19.
by WindowsDev 1y ago
Is the source code which leaked everything one would need to host their own copy of the site?
20.
Release: Windows taskbar auto-hide option toggler(github.com)
2 points by WindowsDev 1y ago|0 comments