Vapormac

6 ms·

1.
by Vapormac 1y ago
You're totally right. I think the article is just inherently too reductionist, which is like of a foundation of analysis in general, is to reduce and then reason about some process/object. However, I think a lot of analysis is (fo
2.
by Vapormac 2y ago
Scorpion and frog
3.
by Vapormac 3y ago
Mandated safety features wouldn't increase stock price of any of the auto manufacturers. You might be able to expose yourself to the increase in price if you can isolate the manufacturer(s) of the technology involved itself. You'r
4.
by Vapormac 3y ago
https://archive.is/RHz9R (No paywall)
5.
by Vapormac 4y ago
I'm not sure, but I mainly post the links when my network won't let me view it from work. Or when it's paywalled. I believe OP's usually want to support the work they are ostensibly paying to read. I just want to read in
6.
by Vapormac 4y ago
https://archive.is/Wgxug (non-paywall)
7.
by Vapormac 4y ago
https://archive.is/GvwHE (non-paywall)
8.
by Vapormac 4y ago
The (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) is chef's kiss
9.
by Vapormac 4y ago
https://archive.is/nHQgm (non paywall)
10.
by Vapormac 4y ago
(Non-paywall): https://archive.is/hXnEw
11.
by Vapormac 5y ago
Is the _underscores_ around words supposed to signify something? Or am I just using the wrong browser to view HN and it's not rendering or something. Sorry if this is an obtuse question I'm new here.
12.
by Vapormac 5y ago
I'm not sure if that's true. But I'm willing to assume COVID has a 99% recover-ability rate. Don't other diseases have a 99% recover-ability rate and we still vaccinate for them? Shouldn't we vaccine against a disea