UebVar

7 ms·

1.
by UebVar 3mo ago
You are misinformed, I suspect you have no idea what you are talking about. As I said, I do not know all legal systems in the world. If there one where "material gain" matches your idea, please cite the law or a case that includes
2.
by UebVar 3mo ago
No, you are wrong. In German and French (roman) legal systems this is a "Vermögensdelikt", and explicitly about material damage and gain. Yes, common law can be more broad (in canada it isn't really, it just also includes s
3.
by UebVar 3mo ago
I'm very certain that this is not fraud, across multiple legal systems, both roman and common law. In both cases fraud requires a person is deprived of a material good. Neither the defrauded person or their material loss is present in
4.
by UebVar 4mo ago
I think this is a meme in marketing departments, but not actually true. For the longest time ICE car makers build cars that screamed "electric". They mostly where behind expectations. At that time the by far most successful EV bra
5.
by UebVar 5mo ago
This is historic. To put this into perspective for people how to not follow running: This is about about as big as "derGrobe" beating the one-minute-mark in 4b2c.
6.
by UebVar 7mo ago
The french company IN Groupe.
7.
by UebVar 7mo ago
I disagree. The plug is usually part of an appliance connector cable, that has no idea what happens to be on the other side aswell. If you size that cable for the same current as the socket, the cable itself is protected by the circuit brea
8.
by UebVar 8mo ago
I feel like the humanoid form is getting in the way for that, and that a "Spot" like design with a hand on top is better suited for that. Also i think laundry and dishes are already 95% automated since about 50 years.
9.
by UebVar 8mo ago
"Tech" was incredible light on CapExp compared with everything else (until AI hit, that is). That is what allowed its explosive growth. On the one hand alphabet is not used to that. On the other hand it is turning into a more norm
10.
by UebVar 8mo ago
Roads are not solving transportation , they are closer to a sophisticated trace track. Roads are a constrained Operational Design Domain: - Geofenced areas - pre-build structures - Curated infrastructure - fallback to gravel in times of t
11.
by UebVar 8mo ago
The interview started with the most mundane question "Who are you?", and the very first sentence of Wales is either a lie or misleading. The journalists asks for clarification (thats a journalists job, btw), and in his second sent
12.
by UebVar 9mo ago
>(This is probably because Google Maps can be used for walking/biking too) Please don't do that. The map is simply not good enough and does not have enough context (road quality, terrain, trail difficulty) for anything but very
13.
by UebVar 10mo ago
No, and explanations on how it could work are implausible.
14.
by UebVar 11mo ago
So you where banned for, by your own accord, motivated reasoning? This is the best endorsement for wikipedia possible.
15.
by UebVar 11mo ago
Arabic, even. An outlier, as it is AFAIK the only arabic dialect that is not written with the arabic alphabet. Also it's far removed from other arabic dialects.
16.
by UebVar 1y ago
Him being on the board of Palantir seems very specific. Empowering the worlds dictators is not compatible with my idea of a good guy.
17.
by UebVar 1y ago
Yes, you did. >We phased out nuclear power plants your words. simple past tense.
18.
by UebVar 1y ago
As you can see in the first link, there was a 472 TWh production of nuclear Nuclear power in 2024, in contrast to your claim that it was phased out. It didn't really changed that much - the absolute change in coal or renewables combind
19.
by UebVar 1y ago
What you say is spectacular and completely wrong. What you claim didn't happen, and can easily disproven with data. Your interpretation of a reasoning of a policy (that didn't happen) is bad faith. You are wrong about both electri
20.
by UebVar 1y ago
> because they can only solve things that are already within their training set. That is just plain wrong, as anybody who spent more than 10 minutes with a LLM within the last 3 years can attest. Give it a try, especially if you care to
21.
by UebVar 1y ago
This is "can" has exactly the same meaning as in "UB can make your programms faster". You could replace it with "it does, at least with clang". LTO is, in this regard, the same as UB, and unlike guaranteed opti
22.
by UebVar 2y ago
I have worked in big environments. My idea about "big" might be naive, environments spanning different Oses and different, including old languages like fortran and pascal. But I never been in a situation where I couldn't chec
23.
by UebVar 2y ago
The argument is tautological. I want to use a text editor => This is the wrong tool => Yes, but I want to use a text editor. These people do use the wrong tooling. The only way to cure this grievance is to use proper tooling. The gith
24.
by UebVar 2y ago
Somewhat separating owning and non owning memory in the type system goes a long way. Also a much better standard library and a stricter typing discipline. The fact that it's mostly backwards compatible means you can reproduce almost al
25.
by UebVar 2y ago
If you don't use an IDE, you are doing it wrong, plain and simple. Editing png with a text editor is also much harder than editing ppm. But there is no reason to consider this usecase when defining a image format.
26.
by UebVar 3y ago
Implementing a constexpr strlen() is trivial and I looks just like it's from your ancient C textbook, save for the "constexpr" keyword. No goofyness involved. Or you use what the C++ standard library has to offer. std::string