U2EF1

6 ms·

1.
by U2EF1 1y ago
They could steal a smaller cannon first and use that on any chains or locks.
2.
by U2EF1 3y ago
Join the rest of us in post-1950's complexity theory. We can use register machines now. Or you can bust out the big bucks and buy a RASP.
3.
by U2EF1 3y ago
LE by default successfully ran 2 months prior. 2 months and 5 years are two completely different worlds in terms of bit rot. That and there are many generic tutorials and scripts and knowledgeable devs for configuring LE fresh.
4.
by U2EF1 3y ago
It's all just theories. But yes the article is basically summarizing a new paper/model. Most likely: the model is incorrect in some ways. But maybe useful in others.
5.
by U2EF1 3y ago
I mean yeah that's basically what high compression solutions like paq have done, depending on the compression level desired apply increasingly speculative and computationally intensive models to the block and pick whichever one worked
6.
by U2EF1 3y ago
But what if they stole it for their 7 year old cancer ridden son, who only wants to be happy once before he dies.
7.
by U2EF1 8y ago
[citation needed]
8.
by U2EF1 12y ago
So he really means they were "waiting for IO" bound.
9.
by U2EF1 12y ago
C has some of the best static analysis and debugging tools of any language, but all of that's worthless if you don't use them. Doubly so if you specifically handicap those tools and write your own obfuscated allocation scheme. Hea
10.
by U2EF1 12y ago
You could run something like TAILS in a VM or docker, I guess.
11.
by U2EF1 13y ago
Worse, overwriting SSD's with random data would halve their lifespan, and some SSD's don't even allow you to control where exactly you are writing to. Better to just never write unencrypted data to the drive at all.
12.
by U2EF1 13y ago
In C, then translate that to Go of course ;)
13.
by U2EF1 13y ago
The only real surprise is that Salesforce wasn't better able to obscure it. Still, they weren't giving out a million dollars for a days work.
14.
by U2EF1 13y ago
wat
15.
by U2EF1 13y ago
empty dict: {:} empty set: {} Ah, the road not taken.
16.
by U2EF1 13y ago
> My compromise of .5 was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration.
17.
by U2EF1 13y ago
VTSMX
18.
by U2EF1 13y ago
It's not a bug. This is how you display that there's no road there right now (unless you are working on construction). Likely this is a pretty good representation of the information available for pathfinding as well.
19.
by U2EF1 13y ago
Just think, within our lifetimes we'll be able to explore this canyon by foot.
20.
by U2EF1 13y ago
Browser equivalence is another thing entirely. Most browsers will accept http://www。google。com (because in Japanese '。' is '.'). But if you tried to request that actual resource it doesn't lead anywhere.
21.
by U2EF1 13y ago
Even better, you can demonstrate the effect pretty easily. Jog alongside a bike and let it go. If it's fast enough, it will stay upright. You can even try to kick it over and the front wheel will turn towards the direction the bike is
22.
by U2EF1 13y ago
I guess his understanding is that trading algorithmically means trading a lot (it doesn't); at low volumes transaction costs dominate.
23.
by U2EF1 13y ago
Not quite, but on track!