Tzt

7 ms·

1.
by Tzt 2mo ago
Well, I don't think even 1% of professionals would be able to. The model used novel zero-days, there are many people in this filed, not many of them discover such vulnerabilities, and probably not on the spot.
2.
by Tzt 2mo ago
Researcher: hack me Model: I committed a crime Researcher: oh my god
3.
by Tzt 6mo ago
This implementation has an explicit mutation rate! That's not in the spirit of the original paper, where programs "mutate" from interacting with other random pre seeded programs.
4.
by Tzt 6mo ago
>Greg Egan's "Rifters" By Peter Watts actually.
5.
by Tzt 8mo ago
"free will" also known as digits of pi mod 2
6.
by Tzt 9mo ago
Yes, absolute majority of new ones use CoTs, long chain of reasoning you don't see. Also some of them use such a weird style of talking in them e.g. o3 talks about watchers and marinade, and cunning schemes https://www.anti
7.
by Tzt 9mo ago
In that analogy "someone" is an AI, who of course switches from answering questions from humans, to answering questions from other AIs, because the demand is 10x.
8.
by Tzt 11mo ago
I agree with this. This a remarkably bad podcast. And also pretty bad paper to focus on. As the podcast was quite bad, I just read it and it was about nothing at all. Like, it's a basically blogpost that muses about uhhh couple example
9.
by Tzt 1y ago
Well, it's also an indicator for how well its other claims would hold up if you dug deeper on them too.
10.
by Tzt 1y ago
Well, there are also legless salamanders, that look like eels pretty much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-toed_amphiuma Some of them have no lungs even: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcaecil
11.
by Tzt 1y ago
I don't get it, does the prediction go backwards or forward along CA generations?
12.
by Tzt 1y ago
CNNs are CA if you don't insert fully connected layers, actually.
13.
by Tzt 1y ago
Well, kinda? I often know what chunks / functions I need, but too lazy to think how to implement them exactly, how they should works inside. Yeah, you need to have overall idea of what you are trying to make.
14.
by Tzt 1y ago
What do you mean several years, it became feasible like 6 months ago lol. No, gpt3.5 doesn't count, it's a completely useless thing.
15.
by Tzt 4y ago
"Wild mammals" nice one, journalism
16.
by Tzt 5y ago
why not make AI on the same platform as the human brain? what is so exceptional about it, and even if it is an exceptional material, why not just use it?