Tv9m

5 ms·

1.
by Tv9m 4y ago
It doesn't seem like you're addressing the HGP example, which at the time, would have been an "individual procedure" as well.
2.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> If an API call can cause a disaster then fix the API By "API" I'm not referring just to publicly facing REST endpoints. I mean things like shell access for system maintenance, that normally only human professionals like
3.
by Tv9m 4y ago
Would you have made the same argument for mobile phones back when they costed $12,000? I'm assuming that many people will want to use this technology.
4.
by Tv9m 4y ago
Not sure if you meant this comment rhetorically or not, but try asking ChatGPT to do something useful like convert some text into JSON, or what conjugation of a verb you should use, or for writing feedback on an email. If you treat it like
5.
by Tv9m 4y ago
I mean that the AI is what's being attacked. It's likely that backend LLM agents will have access to sensitive non-public APIs.
6.
by Tv9m 4y ago
What is the difference? The original prompt isn't what gets used anyways.
7.
by Tv9m 4y ago
Isn't the parent talking about an AI running on the backend? That seems new.
8.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> Is prompt injection even a problem worth worrying about? It depends what API access the AI has. If it's just a chat bot, prompt injection can only reveal facts about its language model. But if the AI has POST access to something,
9.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> But for most usecases, online models trained by megacorps still win. Whisper and whisper.cpp have gotten us close to the tipping point.
10.
by Tv9m 4y ago
You can ask it why yourself. That might have something to do with it.
11.
by Tv9m 4y ago
You might like some of the work being done under the label "Factored Cognition". It's an approach that treats LLMs as building blocks instead of being complete AIs. Instead of asking the LM to solve a problem directly in one
12.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> A few errors show quickly there is no such concept being weilded I would have given similar examples to show that ChatGPT makes the same kinds of mistakes that humans do. The first one is good, because ChatGPT can solve it easily when
13.
by Tv9m 4y ago
Looks like IVF costs around $12,000 today. Considering that this is for your own child, I bet it would be one of the least expensive parts of raising them. I also expect it would become very cheap after it went mainstream. > The Human Ge
14.
by Tv9m 4y ago
"statistical re-mixer" doesn't describe these systems very well. I see this complaint a lot, that supposedly DL models can only manipulate existing content without creating anything of their own. That's just false, unles
15.
by Tv9m 4y ago
What would be evidence that a prediction machine had developed a theory of mind?
16.
by Tv9m 4y ago
I'm always confused. The NWO conspiracy people say that gene editing will be prohibitively expensive (like owning a yacht is), but the real life examples I see don't seem that way. What are some good examples of services that coul
17.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> and it's not pretty. It feels somewhat ironic that when I looked up "Fisherian Runaway" the first thing I saw was an image of a peacock . Evolution by "persistent, directional female choice" seems like exactly
18.
by Tv9m 4y ago
So not like chess, but like how chess was supposed to be?
19.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> Reality, nor even driving, is not anywhere close to that. This reminds me of the kinds of intuitions people had about Chess and Go. In retrospect they seem silly, but it made plenty of sense to them at the time. The fact was that there
20.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> It'll just go "lol I encountered 3 486 864 games with this particular board pattern and 49 652 lead to a victory lemme pick one for the lulz". That isn't really an accurate description of how the modern DL bots work
21.
by Tv9m 4y ago
I think that's already been done: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MuZero
22.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> And then the slippery slope, “we can also improve the odds of higher intellect, being taller , thinner, etc”. I would love to have been born in a world that had slid to the bottom of that particular slope.
23.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> It requires a theory of mind, which means understanding human goals. Like chess?
24.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> endless progress or a good future The optimist believes progress will halt at a convenient moment. The pessimist fears otherwise.
25.
by Tv9m 4y ago
> Artists will need to get real jobs again like the rest of us and fund their art as a side project. You said you were surprised that the creative jobs are being automated first. Are you expecting the "real jobs" to also be aut
26.
by Tv9m 4y ago
"It's a cook book!" hasn't yet entered the Overton window.