Tsukiko

7 ms·

1.
by Tsukiko 12y ago
Can't handle the truth it seems. Thanks for the downvotes.
2.
by Tsukiko 12y ago
Fuck Hacker News. The comment system here sucks camel's ass. After 5 comments I couldn't post for -1.5- 3 hours. That's fucking retarded. And your fucking emotional downvote shit. Worst fucking site for discussion ever. I tho
3.
by Tsukiko 12y ago
Most of text is 2D. What is usually regarded as text is just a collection of simplified and arranged 2D symbols. What is usually regarded as a picture is collection of unarranged non-simplified 2D symbols. 1D text would be more like morse c
4.
by Tsukiko 12y ago
That's because pictures are a form of text. If you didn't know what the hay, a starving black child or a vulture looked like it would just be modern art to you.
5.
by Tsukiko 12y ago
I think the person you are replying to meant symbols when he said "pictures". People aren't copying the text but the symbols. Even if the symbols were more picture-esque there wouldn't be information loss unless the symb
6.
by Tsukiko 12y ago
What unicode does or does not include doesn't matter.
7.
by Tsukiko 12y ago
IMHO tig does this pretty well. https://github.com/jonas/tig
8.
by Tsukiko 12y ago
The only better solution I can think of is direct interfacing between brain and computer (network(s)).
9.
by Tsukiko 12y ago
Alphabets are just symbols that have some sort of meaning to you. Alphabets in a row are text. There are symbols that have no meaning to you but still are te xt such as Kanji or Korean alphabet for some people yet you consider them text. Un
10.
by Tsukiko 12y ago
Very rarely is WYSIWYG in a plain text format. When the author talks about text he doesn't refer to WYSIWYG.