Trombone12

5 ms·

1.
by Trombone12 3y ago
LLM's are definitely the sort of thing people in general mean when they say "AI". The act of using "an AI" to generate a license restricting the use of AI can have many motivations, but an obvious one is the simple
2.
by Trombone12 3y ago
It's for fairness, the EU has to handicap itself after the US decided to ban abortion and persecute trans people.
3.
by Trombone12 3y ago
There were plenty of top tier Covid vaccines created in Europe, and a Danish pharmaceutical is currently crushing the US weight loss market: your jingoism is deluding you.
4.
by Trombone12 3y ago
Since value is only defined by what people are willing to pay for it, and lacking any extra common rules, these acts of copying simply signal not accepting the demanded price: so the value claimed by the owner was not the actual value , th
5.
by Trombone12 3y ago
You can just drop "intellectual" and there will be no fundamental change to the argument, it's only the name of the laws defining "property" that change.
6.
by Trombone12 3y ago
Uh, surely "I know it is more complicated but I will not mention that" is the lazy stance?
7.
by Trombone12 3y ago
> I ask because there were released US NIH emails discussing a base sequence not close to any in natural sequences If you are seriously asking, you'll have to be much more specific about which exact sequence is being alleged as impo
8.
by Trombone12 3y ago
You asking a Replika AI for evidence against natural spillover does not amount to making the basic science "an increasingly shaky claim". Also, try to use less double negations in your writing "I don't necessarily think
9.
by Trombone12 3y ago
Why? Covid-19 was a natural spillover, not a "synthetic virus". If he does feel vindicated he's a straight up loony conspiracy theorist.
10.
by Trombone12 3y ago
"Hey, any IP lawyers want to sue Microsoft for stealing our IP?"
11.
by Trombone12 3y ago
The board do own Chat-GPT though
12.
by Trombone12 3y ago
I guess that's because most "startups" aren't controlled by non-profits.
13.
by Trombone12 3y ago
Because you care about accuracy?
14.
by Trombone12 3y ago
> My lesson from this: outcomes causal inference is very dependent on assumptions and methodologies, of which the options are many. This seems like a natural feature of any sensitive method, not sure why this is something to complain abo
15.
by Trombone12 3y ago
A program is not some discreet, one time, thing, it's an extended process involving many many decision points: It's pretty flippant to pretend that statistic reasoning developed for when you draw things out of a hat is equally val
16.
by Trombone12 3y ago
Hey, at least Getty handed over some money as the basis for that claim, OpenAI et all are leaning on "our scraper brought it back" to maker their version of that exact claim.
17.
by Trombone12 3y ago
> new center-right coalition Holy fascist washing batman! There's no centre party in the Tidö government, it just has conservatives puppeteer by a far right party founded by neo-Nazis...
18.
by Trombone12 3y ago
And how does that upend anything? That it fell out already in the car does not seem dramatically different from it falling out after shaking Kennedy a bit.
19.
by Trombone12 3y ago
If it's GDPR you're referring to, I think these bits of Article 17 (right to be forgotten) are relevant: """ Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to the extent that processing is necessary: ... (d) for archiving purpo
20.
by Trombone12 3y ago
As the support schedule for python is known ahead of time, this scenario seems pretty well covered by "disclosure of how long the product will receive security updates": just choose the EOL for the relevant python version in the d
21.
by Trombone12 3y ago
Drones aren't that new militarily speaking, and aren't particularly survivable against Russian EW systems: they're simply cheap enough that Ukraine can afford to replace the current rate of losses of about 10 000 UAVs per mon
22.
by Trombone12 3y ago
> Like in computing all electricity just becomes waste heat I mean, not all of the IT sector is ad-tech you know; for example, many would argue that the systems durably recording how much money you own provide a useful service.
23.
by Trombone12 3y ago
From the second link: > students approached this “Year in School” question in a number of different ways. For example, a junior might have written “junior”, or “2016” or “class of 2016” or “3” (to signify that they are in their third yea
24.
Large language models aren’t like disabled people(medium.com)
2 points by Trombone12 3y ago|1 comments
25.
by Trombone12 3y ago
Indeed, if we don't care at all about "x is y" statements being true, they can be "applied" to reading. To determine if an art student and DALL-E really are the same, despite their very obvious difference (one ha
26.
by Trombone12 4y ago
I find redactle and its clones to be better games than the context ones because the similarity measures are inherently without any sense, and so even if you guess the correct word it often feels like pure luck. In redactle winning by pure l
27.
by Trombone12 4y ago
I'd wait for Genzel to comment, some of us remember the disruption disappointment of G2 which they don't seem to comment on in the article: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/acb344
28.
by Trombone12 4y ago
But that is certainly not what is being claimed here. What TFA says is that they think Leonardo correctly realised that falling things accelerate, as opposed to fall with a constant speed as (the ancient) Aristotelian physics prescribed. To
29.
by Trombone12 4y ago
Yeah punycode is a bad "solution", it just makes most url look suspect. The comment about the Canadian rules shows that the confusion problem should be handled on the registrar level rather than the url bar.
30.
by Trombone12 4y ago
What the hell, how can you be so colonial you think it is normal to deny someone the right to their name just because it doesn't come from that one language you ever bothered to learn?

More ›