TripolitianFish

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by TripolitianFish 1mo ago

   You certainly could argue that! As you could argue any number of contrived political inferences which are more fun to think about than be of any real use.
2. 2.▲
   by TripolitianFish 2mo ago

   I’d love to live in the USA you’re talking about friend. This is just oriental despotism paranoia, whatever cutsie repetition slogan you come up with is not a serious argument.
3. 3.▲
   by TripolitianFish 2mo ago

   Either argue the point or stop talking. This is a very hard position to take seriously, twee frowny face and all, if you’re willing to sell down the river the privacy of a largely vulnerable population because some sanctimonious humanism. :
4. 4.▲
   by TripolitianFish 2mo ago

   The onus is not on the commenter. The author made badly qualified statements. Thinking of anything as an oracle is dangerous, an “oracle” is not just another “tool” it’s a religion
5. 5.▲
   by TripolitianFish 2mo ago

   Inconceivable
6. 6.▲
   by TripolitianFish 2mo ago

   You’re braindead, hand waving an argument with common sense isn’t actually interacting with anyone in a meaningful manner, you would be more use saying this to a wall. The point the original poster is making is that this is a private system
7. 7.▲
   by TripolitianFish 2mo ago

   > plain wrong > (in my experience) What are you even saying.